|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
16-09-2012, 07:12 PM | #91 | ||
...
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 464
|
If ford had a cheaper V8 I would have got one but since they didn't I have a ssv, also im not a ford or holden man so brand loyalty was never a deciding factor. Ford i think has the superior product but lack in pricing.
__________________
It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
|
||
16-09-2012, 07:14 PM | #92 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
|
Quote:
Just offering a new wheel size e.g. 20" requires huge amounts of testing and configuration of many different systems within the car as sometimes things don't do what you expect e.g. BA2 F6 clutch. To make a manual ecoboost would require a new gearbox which would have to be tested and complied as well as the engine retested in this new configuration. There would be a new drive shaft and the interaction between all of these and the rest of the chassis would need to be tested and complied. I suspect they don't want another tail shaft problem similar to the AU. There is a reason why it takes several years to bring out and update and a decade to bring in a platform change. Did you ever see the first prototype DOHC I6 at the discovery centre, it was built in 1987 but we did not see it in production until 2002 and even then it demonstrated only some of the features of the current engine. The topic is "Ford losing sales by not making an XR8" and it is true they are. They are also losing sales by not building a GTHO, Panel van, LTD, Landau, Cortina, Fairlane, Wagon, Coupe, Convertable and whatever else that someone might or might not buy. On the other hand they are making money and employing Australians. Bottom line Falcon is not all things to all people. If you want a front wheel hybrid then buy a Toyota, if you was a rotary then buy a mazda and if you want a cheap low performance V8 RWD Australian car then please BUY A HOLDEN. If on the other hand you want the fastest performance car ever made in this country then buy a FPV GT R-Spec A simple observation: The slowest and cheapest FPV is quicker than the top of the range HSV The EB4 is quicker than the entry level V6. The ecoLpi if light years ahead of the any GMH offering. The G6ET and XR6T are quicker than the SS. Today in 2012 the only thing that Ford do not offer is a low performance superseded technology V8 for people who want to talk the talk rather than walk the walk and I, for one, am philosophically against lowering standards to appease whingers who have historically shown that for the most part will not by them new anyway. |
|||
16-09-2012, 07:20 PM | #93 | |||
Oo\===/oO
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
|
Quote:
Because no-one would buy it... just like 3V 5.4's...
__________________
|
|||
16-09-2012, 07:22 PM | #94 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,424
|
V8 falcons didnt sell, thats why it was killed.
This is fact, and pretty damn obvious.......... |
||
16-09-2012, 07:25 PM | #95 | |||
Rob
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,763
|
Quote:
|
|||
16-09-2012, 07:27 PM | #96 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 740
|
Quote:
|
|||
16-09-2012, 07:28 PM | #97 | ||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,695
|
I didn't realise they had to test every choice of model, so I guess I know why it doesn't work.
|
||
16-09-2012, 07:43 PM | #98 | |||
Oo\===/oO
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
|
Quote:
"Ford didn't have a cheap V8 so i bought a SSV" What a load of bunghole gunk If he really wanted a cheap V8 he would have gone for a base SS (not even compareable to a V8 XT)...instead its a 58K SSV, same cost as a Supercharged GS...
__________________
|
|||
16-09-2012, 07:46 PM | #99 | |||
Giddy up.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kramerica Industries.
Posts: 15,637
|
Quote:
|
|||
16-09-2012, 08:06 PM | #100 | ||
Stock Boss
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canberra
Posts: 568
|
Seems we've reached the point in the thread where it's going to run around in circles.
General opinion is - yes ford are losing out by not offering a more entry level V8, although not enough to justify the R+D imvolved in re-introducing one. On a side note, I also didnt realise the whole car would require so much extra testing for minor changes, I assumed if it was the same chassis and used the base of an existing model it would all be pretty straight forward
__________________
03 BA XR8 Blueprint | Manual | Leather | Premium sound | Sunroof | Shockworks coilovers | TrueTrac + 3.73 Diff Gears
|
||
16-09-2012, 08:12 PM | #101 | |||
moderator ford coupe club
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,640
|
Quote:
|
|||
16-09-2012, 08:19 PM | #102 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 740
|
There's little use in the thread continuing... The usual suspects who believe Ford can do no wrong in regards to selling the Falcon are so opposed to criticism from those who dare suggest otherwise (like maybe a cheaper 8 would boost sales) that any "debate" is a waste of time.
|
||
16-09-2012, 08:20 PM | #103 | ||
...
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 464
|
I get a discount on Holdens due to family members who work there. I wanted a v8 for the first time in my life. The SS is what I was originally looking at getting but decided to get the ssv instead which was only possible due to the discount. As I said if ford had a xr8 with a cheaper price tag that's the way I may of went.
__________________
It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
|
||
16-09-2012, 08:23 PM | #104 | |||
Experienced Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australasia
Posts: 7,730
|
Quote:
|
|||
16-09-2012, 08:30 PM | #105 | |||
Giddy up.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kramerica Industries.
Posts: 15,637
|
Quote:
Now I have heard it all |
|||
16-09-2012, 08:32 PM | #106 | ||
...
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 464
|
Just FYI if ford had an xr8 for arguments sake at 48-50k I would have payed the EXTRA for it. Hopefully in a year when I sell the commodore I'll only lose a couple grand... how short sighted of me.....
__________________
It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
|
||
16-09-2012, 08:34 PM | #107 | |||
...
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 464
|
Quote:
__________________
It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
|
|||
16-09-2012, 08:40 PM | #108 | |||
Giddy up.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kramerica Industries.
Posts: 15,637
|
Quote:
A FPV GS...... You claim you would have spent your hard earned and more over the Commodore so why are you sitting here trying to justify your decsion with going the CHEAPER route, because that is how I see it, it has nothing to do with your claims of Ford not offering a V8 as technically they do and at a competitive price aswell. The only person you are fooling here is yourself and those that have whinged constantly over the yr's about a product at which they themselves can be part blamed for not being available today. |
|||
16-09-2012, 08:42 PM | #109 | ||
Oo\===/oO
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
|
I've found Demo FG2 GS falcons for 50k...
Same price as an SS. And with leather, nice supercharged motor, big rims etc...
__________________
|
||
16-09-2012, 08:42 PM | #110 | |||
Experienced Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australasia
Posts: 7,730
|
Quote:
Last edited by Auslandau; 16-09-2012 at 08:47 PM. Reason: Quit the name calling .... |
|||
16-09-2012, 08:48 PM | #111 | ||
335 - STILL THE BOSS ...
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melb East
Posts: 11,421
|
Can I whinge that I cannot get a cheap new V8 Audi for the same price as an SS ..... cos I would really really love one?
__________________
'73 Landau - 10.82 @ 131mph '11 FG GT335 - 12.43 @ 116mph '95 XG ute - 3 minutes, 21.14 @ 64mph 101,436 MEMBERS ......... 101,436 OPINIONS ..... What could possibly go wrong! Clevo Mafia [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
||
16-09-2012, 08:50 PM | #112 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,398
|
Quote:
Sure, Ford could offer a low cost NA 5.0 V8 powered XR8 but chances are that people would still not buy it for one reason or the other, Ford knows it, plenty here do too... |
|||
16-09-2012, 09:01 PM | #113 | |||
...
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 464
|
Quote:
So just to sum up in dot points so its easy - not a ford OR Holden fan boy - couldn't afford the gs but could afford the ssv due to the ridiculous Holden employee discount - not a cheap scape who wants everything for nothing. Not everyone can afford the best On that point, what do you drive, a nice new shiney fpv I hope since it seems everyone who doesn't buy at least a gs is a cheap fool.
__________________
It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
|
|||
16-09-2012, 09:06 PM | #114 | |||
Giddy up.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kramerica Industries.
Posts: 15,637
|
Quote:
|
|||
16-09-2012, 09:13 PM | #115 | ||
Oo\===/oO
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
|
A Xr8 was avaiable....and at 45k...
And it sold poorly... But we have a GS, and its part of FPV's raising sales (up something like 60%, where Falcon sales as a whole have dropped...), seems people are happy to pay more money for a V8.... So, to stick with the topic...the lack of an XR8 would not be hurting ford too much. Sure, they could have one...and it might attract a few more buyers, but it would/could also steal away sales from the GS and XR6 turbo...and that would hurt Ford through less profit gained per sale...
__________________
|
||
16-09-2012, 09:15 PM | #116 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 740
|
The topic of this thread?
It asks a question. Those that respond that yes, Ford is missing out, maybe they should have a cheaper 8 are aggresively attacked by the usuals. It doesn't allow or encourage a two way discussion. Which I thought was one of the attributes of this forum. In summary, there are a couple of people who think that there is room for a cheaper 8. |
||
16-09-2012, 09:18 PM | #117 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 740
|
How many years ago are we talking Nikked?
What was it's engine? How much power did it put out? It didn't sell very well at the end because the turbo 6 was so much quicker. That isn't the case anymore. |
||
16-09-2012, 09:20 PM | #118 | ||
Experienced Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australasia
Posts: 7,730
|
Last edited by Auslandau : Today at 08:47 PM. Reason: Quit the name calling ....
Name calling, sorry I was merely stating in a term who would pay more if they have to.... no insult intended. |
||
16-09-2012, 09:20 PM | #119 | ||||
moderator ford coupe club
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,640
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
16-09-2012, 09:22 PM | #120 | ||||
...
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 464
|
Quote:
Quote:
Im not whinging that ford doesnt have a car to met my needs, thats life, move on. I did and i bought a holden.
__________________
It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
|
||||