|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-02-2012, 10:08 PM | #91 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,653
|
Quote:
|
|||
01-02-2012, 10:09 PM | #92 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,428
|
The difference is that the I-4 Ecoboost ias intended to add sales to the Falcon portfolio while a V6 diesel
would most likely replace I-6 sales and if anything like Territory sales, the I-6 would be gone overnight.... |
||
01-02-2012, 10:13 PM | #93 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 665
|
Quote:
Falcon cannot survive of 20,000units/pa [Its Mitsu 380 days again!] Before they close it down, i will buy 1 last Falcon [had 3] a cab chassis ECOLPI and drive it till the wheels fall off, then go with a broken heart and buy a Commodore Ute prefer a c/chassi if it reterns [Did i mention a Commodore Ute like the Falcon Ute can fit a Chep pallet in between the wheelarches, did u get that T6 Ranger?] |
|||
01-02-2012, 10:17 PM | #94 | ||||
Oo\===/oO
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
|
Quote:
Quote:
It looks like ford are trying to make the two more unique, rather then the terri being seen as a falcon wagon in some aspects... Ecoboost tech seems to be just as good as TDi anyway, and when diesel cost more at the pump, EB4 is probally more appealing amongst the sedan buyers...
__________________
|
||||
01-02-2012, 10:18 PM | #95 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 665
|
[quote=Nikked][quote=RASER]
Lol, panelvan, coupe... They can learn from VW Golf and build lots of body styles cheaply from the standard vehicle platform, not rocket science, the Terri is a Falcon in drag Fairlane selling 5 cars a month... How many does Holden do with the Statesman?, lots, and Holden make big money out of it, and even PM Julia gets to ride around in one! THE problem with Ford in AUS is the management |
||
01-02-2012, 10:21 PM | #96 | ||
Oo\===/oO
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
|
VW also sell cars world wide...not just australia, and share development cost over the VW autogroup...
__________________
|
||
01-02-2012, 10:21 PM | #97 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 665
|
Any LPG ECOLPI for the 4Booster donk?
Game On, gut feeling the aftermarket will be licking lips counting the days at tweaking [13s?/Q-Mile] these new 4 cyl. turboed donks! |
||
01-02-2012, 10:25 PM | #98 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: On The Footplate.
Posts: 5,086
|
Quote:
I think they're totally justified in quoting fuel figures on European based cars giving results from premium unleaded...in most places the "normal" unleaded is what we call "premium". |
|||
01-02-2012, 10:27 PM | #99 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,428
|
Quote:
|
|||
01-02-2012, 10:30 PM | #100 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 665
|
Quote:
And @ US$1.06 to our $1, the US built Ecobooster donk could well have been a fair bit less to make than the IL6, only Ford HQ knows the exact figure I appreciate the way it goes, and its lower fuel use, but its not my cup of tea All we need now is the WRX crowd fitting BOV's to them! :-) |
|||
01-02-2012, 10:43 PM | #101 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,428
|
Quote:
the little V6 Ecoboost should be around 240 Kw and 510 nm, now that's an engine.... |
|||
01-02-2012, 10:44 PM | #102 | |||
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,768
|
Quote:
|
|||
01-02-2012, 10:49 PM | #103 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
|
Quote:
|
|||
01-02-2012, 10:50 PM | #104 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 665
|
Quote:
The LWB's future depends on USA law enforcement export sales, i also believe that the wheelbase is the same as the Ute, so i can see them selling it into the future, a great sole niche-product since Ford walked away from it. |
|||
01-02-2012, 10:52 PM | #105 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,428
|
Quote:
|
|||
01-02-2012, 11:03 PM | #106 | |||
Peter Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
|
Quote:
The Caprice has bombed. Won't be long before it drops to double figures a month here. Ford was right to drop Fairlane, the LWB market is dead. As much as we didn't want it to happen, it needed to. |
|||
01-02-2012, 11:09 PM | #107 | |||
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,768
|
Quote:
Ute isn't LWB. |
|||
01-02-2012, 11:13 PM | #108 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,653
|
[QUOTE=RASER][quote=Nikked]
Quote:
|
|||
01-02-2012, 11:33 PM | #109 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,523
|
I'm on record of being a big fan of the EcoBoost concept. It was always going to work. It will be a stunner. Low pressure boost giving 'displacenment on demand"
It amazes me that the same meatheads who think that that you can build a 500kw 4.0 I6 in their back, think it's impossible for FoMoCo with all its resources to build a 180kw 2.2 I4.
__________________
Oooh baby living in Miami....
|
||
02-02-2012, 12:04 AM | #110 | ||
Rob
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,822
|
some people really need to let go of the cylinder count part. just forget that its a 4 cyl!!
350nm @ 2000rpm means you won't be revving tits off anything to get moving. this thing will have performance similar to BA falcon. the I6 should now be XR6 only! make the xr6 something different and special again. |
||
02-02-2012, 12:49 AM | #111 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,428
|
Bring on the V6 and Diesel Ecoboost!
__________________
2001 Falcon Fairmont AU2 Big turbo coming Lsd |
||
02-02-2012, 01:51 AM | #112 | |||
Now Fordless
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fremantle, WA
Posts: 3,611
|
Quote:
|
|||
02-02-2012, 10:01 AM | #113 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
|
Quote:
Globally it outsells the Falcon ute and is a high-margin vehicle in some markets: China, South Korea, Australia. |
|||
02-02-2012, 10:12 AM | #114 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 717
|
In the end, time will be judge as to how durable and reliable the EB4 will be. I believe it will be as reliable as any modern engine on the market today and at least gives Ford a chance to retain those who shop for vehicles purely on fuel economy numbers. Sill reckon it would tune up very well and if it is as sweet a motor as the venerable SR20 Nissan motor, may end up with as great a cult following.
|
||
02-02-2012, 10:12 AM | #115 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 3,246
|
Can we get back ON TOPIC?
The topic is about the EcoBoost Falcon. 6L/100km economy will get EB Falcon from Sydney to Brisbane on a smaller tank of fuel than the Commodore needs to go the lesser distance of Sydney to Melbourne with a bigger tank. I think they should use a similar advert to the Territory. "Over 1100km from a tank? Get out of town!" Comparing the power / torque and economy figures against Mazda 3 is essential too. The next gen engine in the Mazda 3 is coming soon, so Ford better be quick on this.
__________________
BA2 XR8 Rapid M6 Ute - Lid - Tint -18s 226.8rwkW@178kmh/537Nm@140kmh 1/9/2013 14.2@163kmh 23/10/2013 Boss349 built. Not yet run. Waiting on a shell. Retrotech thread http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...1363569&page=6 |
||
02-02-2012, 10:23 AM | #116 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,591
|
Agreed mate.
It is now time for Ford to grow a set and start directly comparing, more-so because its in their favour now!
__________________
|
||
02-02-2012, 11:05 AM | #117 | ||
Rob
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,822
|
speaking of which cars to target, i think they should target any car within its range that could help its image. camry, accord/accord euro, i45, optima, etc.
they may not win over many customers who were looking at any of those vehicles, but they just need to make sure they are in the frame. this is a first for the ford world, so there is a lot riding on it. not sales as such, but just how the car goes in the real world. people associate '4cyl in a large car' with 'underpower' and 'overweight' etc. its evidenced on here even. people focus on the 4cyl bit and not the numbers. if it was a diesel, and was producing 350nm @ 2000rpm, the response would be a lot different i feel. i think this engine 'on paper' should perform better than a diesel as it has a fair whack of power to go with the torque. if it has 350nm @ 2000 rpm, then at 1000 - 1500 rpm theres a good chance torque is still at a reasonable level. the biggest thing in fighting fuel consumption is getting the weight up and moving. these figures combined with the gearing should get the job done nicely. once up and moving, the power and torque needed is minimal. this is why driving style in traffic can make a big difference in larger cars. its sure on my radar for the future. i can match fords official figure on the highway in my fg (loaded even) so 6l/100km is very attractive to me as i use my car to travel interstate on family trips every year. i wonder how that would stack up against ecoLPi. it would all depend largely on pump price. |
||
02-02-2012, 11:25 AM | #118 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 717
|
Will EB4 be available as both a manual and an automatic?
|
||
02-02-2012, 11:28 AM | #119 | |||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,591
|
Quote:
Unfortunately the populous is generally lazy and making a manual just for this car wont happen. It would be awesome in a capri or escort!
__________________
|
|||
02-02-2012, 11:45 AM | #120 | |||
Rob
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,822
|
Quote:
Ecoboost Falcon 2.0L 4cyl (T), Auto 6 speed: Combined - 8.1 l/100km Urban - 11.8 l/100 km Extra Urban - 6.0 l/100 km Toyota Camry 2.5L 4cyl, Auto 6 speed Combined - 7.8 Urban - 10.9 Extra Urban 6.0 Honda Accord Euro 2.4L 4cyl, Auto 5 speed Combined - 8.9 Urban - 12.3 Extra Urban - 6.9 Mazda 6 2.5L 4cyl, Auto 5 speed Combined - 8.7 Urban - 11.9 Extra Urban - 6.8 i used all auto's to keep it 'apples for apples'. some manual figures were more efficient. as you can see, the ecoboost falcon is right in the thick of it. its all up to image and perception now. if all the members on here want the falcon to survive, they should do their part and keep any negative comments to themselves. |
|||