Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22-03-2010, 01:07 AM   #1
csv8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
csv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,318
Thumbs up J.D. Power and Associates 2010 Vehicle Dependability Study

The most reliable cars
RICHARD BLACKBURN
March 19, 2010


J.D. Power and Associates 2010 Vehicle Dependability Study.
An annual dependability survey in the US has ranked Toyota, Honda and Ford as the most reliable mainstream brands.

Toyota's reputation has received a much needed boost, with the embattled Japanese car maker ranking first among mainstream brands in a leading quality survey in the US.

Toyota, which is under siege after recalling more than 8 million vehicles worldwide, came sixth in the JD Power vehicle dependability survey, finishing behind luxury brands Porsche, Lincoln, Buick, Lexus and Mercury.

The maker finished just in front of Japanese rival Honda and US giant Ford, which has steadily improved in recent years.

The JD Power study, which measures the number of problems experienced by car owners in their first three years of ownership, is widely recognised as the most authoritative in the industry.

It measures the "things gone wrong" per 100 vehicles and covers 198 different problems. Although it is not directly related to the Australian market, it remains the best guide for consumers, as local car makers still refuse to make similar survey information public here.

Luxury brands Porsche and Mercedes-Benz were the big movers this year, with Porsche taking the top spot after finishing 11th last year, while Mercedes-Benz jumped from 19th to 9th.

Overall, though, European car makers continue to record embarrassing results in the survey. Land Rover finished last out of the 36 brands with 255 problems per 100 vehicles, compared to Porsche's 110.

Volkswagen didn't fare much better, finishing 34th, while Audi, Jaguar, Volvo and BMW all finished below the industry average.

Korean brand Hyundai embarrassed more fancied brands, finishing 11th.

But David Sargent, vice president of global vehicle research for JD Power, says the rankings don't necessarily translate into sales for car makers.

While perception of quality and dependability is the most influential factor in people's new car purchase decisions, some brands that perform well in quality surveys are still avoided by buyers.

Mr Sargent says people still avoid some brands based on outdated perceptions of poor quality that don't match up with reality.

"Producing vehicles with world-class quality is just part of the battle for automakers; convincing customers to believe in their quality is equally as important," he says.

"It takes considerable time to positively change consumer perceptions of quality and dependability - sometimes a decade or more," he says.

Ford and Hyundai still suffered from poor reputations for quality, despite the fact that they ranked above the industry average in the survey.

Good one FORD !!!

__________________
CSGhia
csv8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-03-2010, 01:22 AM   #2
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,397
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Good news for Ford, Lincoln is No.2 while Cadillac is No.12


jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-03-2010, 04:05 PM   #3
irlewy86
Meep Meep
 
irlewy86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southside
Posts: 1,513
Default

Toyota - Things don't go wrong often, but when they do your pretty much stuffed.
__________________
Thundering on....
irlewy86 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-03-2010, 06:47 PM   #4
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Toyota did ok this year, but just wait until the current cars get 3 years old and start being surveyed. Its all downhill from here.

Mazda's results are pretty bad.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-03-2010, 08:53 AM   #5
merlin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
merlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,974
Default

lol@VW
__________________
1966 Ford Mustang coupe. 347 stroker, PA reverse manual C4, TCE high stall converter, B&M Pro Ratchet, Edelbrock alum heads, Edelbrock intake manifold, MSD ignition, Holley Street HP 750 CFM carb, gilmer drive, wrapped Hooker Super Comp Headers, dual 3" straight through exhaust, Bilstein shocks, custom springs, full poly suspension, American Racing rims, Open Tracker roller spring saddles and shelby drop.

Still to go - Holley Sniper EFI with integrated fuel cell.
merlin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-03-2010, 09:41 AM   #6
lofty
Rusticating
 
lofty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lower Lakes, SA
Posts: 541
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Excellent article on AU Power window installation. 
Default

That's interesting. 141 problems per 100 cars is 1.4 problems per car. That sounds ok, but there's no info on what kind of problems. Could be anything from a minor interior trim problem to a potentially lethal throttle failure. So I'm not sure how meaningful the raw number are. Still, it's better than nothing, which is what we get here.
__________________

Territory SYII RWD, BFII RTV tray

Last edited by lofty; 23-03-2010 at 09:50 AM. Reason: additional comments
lofty is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-03-2010, 10:06 AM   #7
cs123
Donating Member
Donating Member3
 
cs123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Morayfield
Posts: 28,243
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: Can't think of anyone more deserving. Russ Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: For all the technical support behind the scenes. Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Technical submission 
Default

surprised at the Mazda results
cs123 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-03-2010, 10:53 AM   #8
Bad Bird
Watts a panhard.
 
Bad Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 929
Default

This year AGAIN shows what I've been saying all along. So many people comment on how good European cars are, but in Australia and the US (where conditions are rough), they just get smashed to pieces.
__________________
I don't have low self-esteem. I have low esteem for everyone else.
Bad Bird is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-03-2010, 12:57 PM   #9
Luke Plaizier
Lukeyson
Donating Member1
 
Luke Plaizier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW
Posts: 2,584
Default

Why does that article focus on Toyota, Honda and Ford when there are so many ahead of them?

But it is worthy noting how well Lincoln and Mercury are also going - since they are Ford brands too.

Would the Falcon live up to Lincoln's brand quality if it were branded a Lincoln and exported?


Lukeyson
__________________
If the human brain was simple enough to understand, we'd be too simple to understand it.
Luke Plaizier is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-03-2010, 01:12 PM   #10
irlewy86
Meep Meep
 
irlewy86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southside
Posts: 1,513
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad Bird
This year AGAIN shows what I've been saying all along. So many people comment on how good European cars are, but in Australia and the US (where conditions are rough), they just get smashed to pieces.
I wouldn't read to much into it, VW and Merc both have plants in the South/Mexico.

TGW can be a subjective test, its more about customer satisfaction than actual quality.
__________________
Thundering on....
irlewy86 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-03-2010, 03:00 PM   #11
aussie muscle
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
aussie muscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,312
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lofty
Still, it's better than nothing, which is what we get here.
and ford definately had those sort of questions in their customer satisfaction survey
__________________
My ride: 2007 Falcon Ute BF XR8 Orange, MTO.
aussie muscle is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-03-2010, 03:36 PM   #12
mickyyyy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,408
Default

How come audi isent there???
__________________
Wanted Either Capri/Cortina/XY/XW/XR/XT with tough V8 stroker engine, auto, 9inch, upgraded brakes etc
mickyyyy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL