Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24-12-2008, 12:02 AM   #31
waggaclint
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
waggaclint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: perth w.a
Posts: 1,074
Default

this article might help ya out http://www.carsales.com.au/news/2008...the-fore-11154
waggaclint is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-12-2008, 12:04 PM   #32
EgoFG
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR6_190
There is no FG Territory, they are going to heavily update the current one, expect FG mechanicals (195Kw 6, 5 speed Auto/ 270kw turbo, 6 speed Auto) FG front end design, maybe a slight change to the tail lights, and an interior based on FG, ...
So what you are saying is that they are making what will be cosmetically close to FG, with some FG mechanicals (and yet somehow not an FG)

Good, that is my starting point
EgoFG is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-12-2008, 12:09 PM   #33
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waggaclint
this will be fords next wagon





I'll take that over the commo wagon. Even if it is FWD.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-12-2008, 12:26 PM   #34
dave289
Banned
 
dave289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: new south wales
Posts: 1,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SumoDog68
Wagons are back in fashion and what better than a nice FG wagon, imagine it with turbo and 6 speed auto. If only Ford OZ could find funds to build one...
http://www.themotorreport.com.au/135...potted-at-tmr/
It is not hard to put a turbo six in a wagon or a v8 for that matter .Its just that ford dont really care to much for their customers needs or desires. A few years back you could get an xr6 wagon and I think also an xr8 in the ef/el series wagons,before that you could also buy a ghia in a wagon or option a v8, not anymore, thanks very much ford, the best you can get these days is a basic six with no option for improvement.I dont even know if they make a fairmont wagon anymore. At holden, who seem to look after their customers needs, wants and desires, offer you an ss wagon with a 6.0 litre engine, and if thats not enough you can have the r8 with a 6.2 in a wagon, cranking out 317kw, now thats looking after their customers.
dave289 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-12-2008, 12:34 PM   #35
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave289
A few years back you could get an xr6 wagon and I think also an xr8 in the ef/el series wagons,before that you could also buy a ghia in a wagon or option a v8, not anymore, thanks very much ford, the best you can get these days is a basic six with no option for improvement.
Yes they did and it failed to sell less then 500 units, wow there's money well spent.

As for its easy to put a T6 and V8 into a wagon for your back yard job yeah piece off pie but with car makers it gets a tad more expensive.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-12-2008, 01:53 PM   #36
4Vman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
4Vman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vztrt
Yes they did and it failed to sell less then 500 units, wow there's money well spent.

As for its easy to put a T6 and V8 into a wagon for your back yard job yeah piece off pie but with car makers it gets a tad more expensive.
Yes.. there's plenty of history of these options and models being avaliable but nobody bought them.. its no wonder Ford dropped them.



__________________
335 S/C GT: The new KING of Australian made performance cars..
4Vman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-12-2008, 05:49 PM   #37
Dezza
Parts bin special
 
Dezza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Narre Warren, Vic
Posts: 8,276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave289
It is not hard to put a turbo six in a wagon or a v8 for that matter .Its just that ford dont really care to much for their customers needs or desires. A few years back you could get an xr6 wagon and I think also an xr8 in the ef/el series wagons,before that you could also buy a ghia in a wagon or option a v8, not anymore, thanks very much ford, the best you can get these days is a basic six with no option for improvement.I dont even know if they make a fairmont wagon anymore. At holden, who seem to look after their customers needs, wants and desires, offer you an ss wagon with a 6.0 litre engine, and if thats not enough you can have the r8 with a 6.2 in a wagon, cranking out 317kw, now thats looking after their customers.
Yep. In recent years (since the BA) there were 2 models of wagon: XT or Futura. You could only get them as a 6, and only as a 4 speed auto. Fairmont was dropped when the BA came out. On EA-EB1, they made Fairmont Ghia wagons, on ED and EF there were XR6 wagons, and from EB through till about AU you could get them with a V8. Manuals were available right through the e-series era. It's a shame the way it's gone.
__________________
Weekender 1964 US Falcon Futura convertible - Rangoon Red
260 Windsor V8, 4 speed manual, LHD, Electronic ignition, Mustang wheels
https://fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11470868

Daily 2014 SZII Territory diesel - basic runabout

Previous Cars 1990 EAII Fairmont Ghia - Tickford engine, 5 speed, SVO wheels, bodykit, much more
2000 AUII Fairmont - XR wheels, Ghia interior
2010 FG XR50T ute - XR8 bonnet, Streetfighter intake
Dezza is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-12-2008, 09:42 PM   #38
FPV8U
BOSS 5.4L Enthusiast
 
FPV8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,943
Default

While i probably wouldn't buy a XR8 Wagen (Unless i ended up with a few too many kids for a sedan down the track :P) i'd love to see ford show some adventure and build something like this..

A car the size of a TTG doesn't interist me in the slightest.
FPV8U is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-12-2008, 11:17 AM   #39
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR6_190
There is no FG Territory, they are going to heavily update the current one, expect FG mechanicals (195Kw 6, 5 speed Auto/ 270kw turbo, 6 speed Auto) FG front end design, maybe a slight change to the tail lights, and an interior based on FG, there is also a possibility of a diesel, and don't hold your breath for a V8, as that's more likely on the way out all together.
Mechanicals won't change to FG spec, they aren't Euro 4 compliant and can't be used. It will only switch to the Falcon spec when the engine goes Euro 4 in 2010.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-12-2008, 11:21 AM   #40
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prydey
i find it amusing that all these people say if ford built an xr wagon they would buy one, but the fact remains, ford did build xr6 wagons in the ed and ef range and sold only 476 in ef and even less of ed. these were not planned to be limited numbers models, thats all they could sell. there is not a big enough market to justify building a performance wagon.

i don't agree with the comment that holden have the market stitched up either. what holden have showed though is that it did not give commodore any increase in sales, it just stole sales off the sedan. this alone would be enough to stop ford investing in a whole new wagon.
Exactly. Wagons are a waste of money for Ford, they sell something like 400 BF3 wagons a month to fleets and they make a lot of profit on them as all R&D is paid for, and Holden can only sell around 1000 wagons a month, so why would Ford bother spending hundreds of millions of dollars to develop a wagon to gain a few hundred extra sales, that may just subsitute for sedan sales like the VE wagon has. :

There will never be an FG wagon.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-12-2008, 11:58 AM   #41
FPV8U
BOSS 5.4L Enthusiast
 
FPV8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vztrt
Yes they did and it failed to sell less then 500 units, wow there's money well spent.

As for its easy to put a T6 and V8 into a wagon for your back yard job yeah piece off pie but with car makers it gets a tad more expensive.
While you are right the V8 Falcon wagon have struggled to move in the past.. there are pkenty of VX-VZ V8 Wagons out and about.

Only an idiot would have got an AU Wagon with a 175kw 5.0L and Leaf spring rear end compared to a VX Wagon with a 220Kw 5.7L and Independant rear end not to mention the Holden Wagens have looked better for the better part of a decade now.
FPV8U is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-12-2008, 01:28 PM   #42
RedHotGT
Long live the Falcon GT
 
RedHotGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,630
Default

as an owner of an Unloved and Unpopular Wagon (EF XR6 wagon)... I will give my 2 cents...

10 years ago, there wasn't as big a market for Wagons.... really there wasn't...
Because Station Wagons were considered bulky, awkward, and ugly (which lets be honest - wasn't far from the truth)... They didn't sell heaps of WAGONS period 10 years ago.... particularly performance wagons...

The sad reality with Ford wagons for the past - well 20 years almost is, you can't make them look pretty from the back.... its a fact...
There was no 'factory' body kit with rear skirts for the E-series wagons.... and the AU/BA/BF rear is the worst **** end I've seen since the XD-XE-XF years.... You can go and get a wicked looking BA/BF XR front end, and you've got a pox-**** end that can't be saved....

Ford have never had the complete package when it comes to wagons.... Whereas Holdens (and this hurts to say it)... have had it sorted since VR/VS days.... All you needed was some decent wheels, and dump it a couple of inches - and you had something that looked pretty reasonable... Same goes for VT-VX and so-on...

Ford are great at jumping off the band-wagon *pardon the pun*, and then jumping back on... Most memorable is dumping the V8 option from the range.... whilst VK VL & VN models sold HEAPS of V8s Ford sat around with their thumbs in their **** standing by their decision... Only to come back to the market with EB 5Litres...

I wrote a letter to Wheels (most recent edition) that was printed about Wagon-oids.... they are the new tomorrow... and this is why I think that Ford DOES need to have an FG wagon... The picture posted in this thread looks good (though i'd drop the rear sunshade)... I'd buy one for sure....

lets just see what happens....
But put me on the list for a XR8 Wagon-oid for sure....
__________________
RedHotGT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-12-2008, 06:39 PM   #43
prydey
Rob
 
prydey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FPV8U
While you are right the V8 Falcon wagon have struggled to move in the past.. there are pkenty of VX-VZ V8 Wagons out and about.
holden sell a lot of v8 models, not just in wagons and a lot of that is because the v6 is a terrible bit of gear.
prydey is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-12-2008, 07:50 PM   #44
FPV8U
BOSS 5.4L Enthusiast
 
FPV8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prydey
holden sell a lot of v8 models, not just in wagons and a lot of that is because the v6 is a terrible bit of gear.
Yes it is.. and average mum and dad don't seem to care they havn't since the VT and dont now as the VE 6 is still a POS compared to the 4.0L I6..

But..

The fact is they can make them sell, like they can make the LWB cars sell.. Ford have just been outclassed for too long in these areas and throwing a FWD Mondeo in the mix would only push Performance Wagon buyers further towards a SS or SSV Wagon.. theres some Nice examples over on LS1.com.au already and yes they are popular around my area, hell even i think they look alright and i do not like wagons.
FPV8U is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2008, 12:09 AM   #45
banarcus
hmm eyebrows
 
banarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lower Hunter Valley, NSW
Posts: 2,393
Default

Why does the link make a reference to a "sportwagon"? That is a name of the holden commodore hatchback or SWB stationwagon. Ford wagons are not called sportwagons. It is just another example of the sheep mentality. Baa baa says the red sheep and all the blue sheep go and follow....

Ford cannot build a decent wagon because they cannot sell a decent sedan range. Simple. If you want it, build one yourself or buy a project from FTG wreckers..
__________________
XE 4.9 Falcon S & XA 4.9 Fairmont hardtop
banarcus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2008, 08:53 AM   #46
max_torq
From the Futura
 
max_torq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 572
Default

sportwagon - it's something of an oxymoron..

Where a wagon excels is hauling decent loads long distances at sedan speeds in sedan comfort at sedan running expenses; they are an efficient vehicle. The modern six also tows like a V8. If Ford is not going to develop the chassis, then they should be priced at a discount accordingly. That would make them attractive cars in this economic climate.
max_torq is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2008, 09:37 AM   #47
prydey
Rob
 
prydey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FPV8U
Y

The fact is they can make them sell,
they (commodore hatch) are selling, yes, but that is at the expense of sedan sales. the overall sales for the commodore are still the same or n the slide. ford will notice this and they will not spen the money developing a wagon when they are almost garaunteed zero return.

having said that, it does seem like the wagon market may be improving, given the number of manufacturers lately bringing out these hatchback type vehicles.

latest wheels mag (jan 09) has a territory v sv6 sportwagon. floor area in the rear is very similar apparently but overall volume is 30% more in the territory. i just went and measured my bf2 wagon and i'm not sure if the floor in the commo and territory is a lot higher but according to the mag, floor to roof measurement at highest point (behind rear seat) is-
commo- 460mm
territory - 500mm
bf2 wgn - 800mm.

length is 1120mm in both test vehicles.
bf2 = 1300mm.

i'd say volume in the current falcon wagon eats both of them for breaky.

at the end of the article the terry got the thumbs up by a huge margin.

for people like me who need a wagon to carry stuff, not just to keep up with trends, i hope if they do bring out an updated wagon, the luggage area is untouched from current specs. lets see anyone put a pram and a few suitcases and a esky in the back of any other so called station wagon.
prydey is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2008, 09:47 AM   #48
kocho
The Futuriser
 
kocho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,836
Default

The problem with the BA/F wagon and VY/Z wagons are that they were far too big. The VE is just that bit smaller, which is good, but it now isn't practical.

Mondeo wagon would be a perfect size IMO.
__________________
Current Subaru Liberty MY08 2.5 SatNav

Previous 2003 BA Ford Futura.

CKGD - Freelance Graphic Designer
kocho is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2008, 11:04 AM   #49
4Vman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
4Vman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kocho
The problem with the BA/F wagon and VY/Z wagons are that they were far too big. .
You'd be the only person to think this..... they're big for a reason, like utes have big trays.... They're work horses.
The commodore hatch was never really intended to replace the VZ wagon... it was simply a cheap way of utilising the sedan floor pan and platform for a bit more carry height.



__________________
335 S/C GT: The new KING of Australian made performance cars..
4Vman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2008, 11:05 AM   #50
FTE217
T3/Sprint8
Donating Member2
 
FTE217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 16,626
Default

There's some good points for and against regarding a Ford falcon wagon but alas it will not happen....it will be interesting what the mondeo wagon will do in sales.
FordOz have been good at commiting "harikiri" many times with specific model segments ie wagon LWB.....
Seeing posts about the commy wagon taking sales from the sedan, so what the general still gets the sale !
__________________
Tickfords T3/TS50 '02
Sprint8 manual Sept 24 '16
Daily Macan GTS
"Don't believe everything you read on the internet. Abraham Lincoln"
FTE217 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2008, 11:23 AM   #51
4Vman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
4Vman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
Seeing posts about the commy wagon taking sales from the sedan, so what the general still gets the sale !
They were always going to get the sale anyway... Holden will be disappointed that all the effort and r+d costs has delivered nothing in terms of incremental sales.
In fact i know of 1 fleet that bought them "sight unseen" on the premise that it was a genuine wagon and after delivery discovered they couldn't fit their expensive reps merchandising unit in the back!!
So repeat business won't be high...



__________________
335 S/C GT: The new KING of Australian made performance cars..
4Vman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2008, 11:32 AM   #52
uranium_death
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
uranium_death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gren A Waverrey
Posts: 2,425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by banarcus
Ford cannot build a decent wagon because they cannot sell a decent sedan range. Simple. If you want it, build one yourself or buy a project from FTG wreckers..
Ford had "decent wagons", but nobody bought them.
Everybody craps on and says, "Gee, I'd love an XR6/8 wagon."

Why? Because there are so few (exclusivity factor?), or because you genuinely want one?
It's great saying, "I'd buy one", but when it comes to actually do it, very few ever answer the call.
Ford did the right thing. They gave it a go, and it didn't work.

The wagon segment is simply not conducive to attracting new buyers.
__________________
Practicing - Sleeping with a guitar in your hand counts, as long as you don't drop it.

Don't snap my undies.
uranium_death is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2008, 11:34 AM   #53
4Vman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
4Vman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uranium_death
Ford had "decent wagons", but nobody bought them.
Everybody craps on and says, "Gee, I'd love an XR6/8 wagon."

Why? Because there are so few (exclusivity factor?), or because you genuinely want one?
It's great saying, "I'd buy one", but when it comes to actually do it, very few ever answer the call.
Ford did the right thing. They gave it a go, and it didn't work.

The wagon segment is simply not conducive to attracting new buyers.
You are spot on.
Everyone is great at coming up with every conceivable model permutation and combination as a "great idea" but when the time comes to hand over the folding everyone runs away..
I dont blame Ford one bit for consolidating their range, its one of the reasons they're in the best shape of the 3 bigs at the moment.



__________________
335 S/C GT: The new KING of Australian made performance cars..
4Vman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2008, 04:58 PM   #54
XR Martin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
XR Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 9,035
Default

I think you will find that the Commodore wagon is similar to most Euro wagons now, the Falcon is probably the last traditional wagon on sale anywhere in the World.
E-Class, A6, 5 series wagons would all be of similar size to a VE Wagon, if not smaller.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170

2004 BA wagon RTV project.

1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red

1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired

1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project.
XR Martin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2008, 06:27 PM   #55
banarcus
hmm eyebrows
 
banarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lower Hunter Valley, NSW
Posts: 2,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uranium_death
Ford had "decent wagons", but nobody bought them.
Everybody craps on and says, "Gee, I'd love an XR6/8 wagon."

Why? Because there are so few (exclusivity factor?), or because you genuinely want one?
It's great saying, "I'd buy one", but when it comes to actually do it, very few ever answer the call.
Ford did the right thing. They gave it a go, and it didn't work.

The wagon segment is simply not conducive to attracting new buyers.
Your 'decent wagon' and what I call a 'decent wagon' are different. I didn't buy a 6cyl wagon because I don't like 6cyl powered cars. I built a wagon that suits my needs, hence the last sentence in my last post. In fact, my wife and have given the SSV hatchback serious consideration.

Perhaps what I shouldv'e said was that Ford cannot justify building a FG wagon if they cannot sell decent numbers of the FG sedan.
__________________
XE 4.9 Falcon S & XA 4.9 Fairmont hardtop
banarcus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2008, 08:20 PM   #56
4Vman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
4Vman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by banarcus
Your 'decent wagon' and what I call a 'decent wagon' are different. I didn't buy a 6cyl wagon because I don't like 6cyl powered cars. I built a wagon that suits my needs, hence the last sentence in my last post. In fact, my wife and have given the SSV hatchback serious consideration.

Perhaps what I shouldv'e said was that Ford cannot justify building a FG wagon if they cannot sell decent numbers of the FG sedan.
Please explain to me how a ssv commodore hatch is a "decent wagon"?
Its not even a real wagon to begin with? Its just a ssv commodore with a hatch rear door instead of a boot lid which gives it a bit more carrying height....
Its a bit like calling a cheese burger a decent hamburger....
Fords inability to sell FG's in larger numbers has nothing to do with the quality of the range.....



__________________
335 S/C GT: The new KING of Australian made performance cars..
4Vman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-12-2008, 09:26 AM   #57
banarcus
hmm eyebrows
 
banarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lower Hunter Valley, NSW
Posts: 2,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Vman
Please explain to me how a ssv commodore hatch is a "decent wagon"?
Its not even a real wagon to begin with? Its just a ssv commodore with a hatch rear door instead of a boot lid which gives it a bit more carrying height....
Its a bit like calling a cheese burger a decent hamburger....
Fords inability to sell FG's in larger numbers has nothing to do with the quality of the range.....

OK okay and ok. What I said in the beginning was that Ford cannot have any hope of justifying/building a new FG wagon because the widely acclaimed FG sedan range is not setting the world on fire. Therefore, if you preferred a Ford station wagon but didn't like what the factory offered, build one yourself or buy a project from FTG.

You could bet your bottom dollar that Ford would've updated their wagon range if the FG was a runaway sales success.

As for decent wagons, I have to compromise in my household. My wife loves V8s so long as they are GM. A commodore hatchback with a V8 is as decent as they come in relation to what is available in the Australian market these days. However, I agree with your assessment of the VE hatch in every regard.
__________________
XE 4.9 Falcon S & XA 4.9 Fairmont hardtop
banarcus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-12-2008, 09:42 AM   #58
4Vman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
4Vman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by banarcus
You could bet your bottom dollar that Ford would've updated their wagon range if the FG was a runaway sales success.

.
I doubt it, Ford would have mad a decision regarding the wagon long before FG went on sale.
Wagon sales are treated separately to sedans, the only reason Ford would have considered a FG wagon was if they thought it would have sold well in its own right.



__________________
335 S/C GT: The new KING of Australian made performance cars..
4Vman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-12-2008, 09:50 AM   #59
cuz
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
cuz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falcon Coupe
I quite like that, as long as it had reasonable space in the rear as opposed to the opposition, I'd consider buying one.

That thing looks bloody horrible!!!
Too much like some euro import POS.
Just keep the current BA/BF styling and drop in a V8 or typhoon options.
Then, I'd buy one.
__________________
Who cares how it looks, power is everything. Looks are for metrosexuals.....
cuz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL