|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-07-2016, 01:49 AM
|
#13 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, Northern Suburbs
Posts: 5,027
|
I'm still not really sure what people are squawking about?
If you bought a Hilux (or Ranger) would that not be classified commercial? There has to be a definition, there is, they have applied it. Just because you feel personally aggrieved doesn't make it wrong. The current Commode utes, and the old Falcons don't have a separate chassis under the tub. ie , you can't remove the tub and substitute a tray or some other body. But you can with a Falcon, Hilux, etc. That's the definition, get over it. They have to make a distinction somehow, and that's what it has always been. I haven't had to look at it for a while, but last I did it was actually an advantage for FBT purposes. |
||
|
|
| 2 users like this post: |
Re: Eastlink - styleside Utes now commercial vehicles?
Threaded Mode