|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-11-2013, 09:53 PM
|
#10 | ||
|
BLUE OVAL INC.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,754
|
XB GS 351 Coupe is on the money here!
A couple of things... The Government is a business, revenue is income. A business will have projected growth figures, if the Government can predict an expectation of growth in the business of traffic infringements it would underline their value as an effective tool. The Government needs income to survive, it receives it in many guises. Fines are one of them but they are optional. Don't get caught and you wont contribute. People always compare tightening laws with rising road tolls and question their effectiveness, yet no one can guarantee the toll wouldn't rise if laws were relaxed, remember, if a business can forecast growth it must have an expanding customer base... My2c. |
||
|
|
Re: Perspective on States and fine revenue.
Threaded Mode