|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
25-10-2005, 04:53 PM
|
#29 | ||
|
Can't get enough of this.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Standing on the driveway sobbing because I don't have a PINK ute anymore :0(
Posts: 1,990
|
Usually if you hit someone from behind regardless of circumstances you are at fault so as you said this is really a very good outcome and even though it doesn’t affect you either way it is nice to know he will be hit up for an excess to pay for his own repairs.
Having two parties at fault usually means that the Insurance companies disagree on who is at fault based on differing versions of events. Your insurance company would be backing your description whilst the other driver’s insurance company is backing his version. Making both parties at fault is a hell of a lot easier and cheaper then taking the matter to court. Has your insurance company mentioned whether or not they will affect your rating based on this outcome? Cheers, Tori |
||
|
|
Threaded Mode