|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
| View Poll Results: What's more dangerous 10km over or 10km under? | |||
| 10kms over is more dangerous |
   
|
62 | 29.25% |
| 10kms under is more dangerous |
  
|
150 | 70.75% |
| Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
23-12-2008, 11:06 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
Fiat POWAAH!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,309
|
I've been noticing lately that a lot of people seem to sit about 10kms under the speed limit. I guess it could be a result of the advertising telling us that speed kills.
But is it really safer? It tends to bank traffic up, particularly in areas where overtaking is scarce. More drivers become impatient, making them do erratic things. So I thought I would throw it out to the wider (and more knowledgeable) community. So, what do you believe is more dangerous and why? Cheers
__________________
Holden: If you cant beat them, buy them. Last edited by DoreSlamR; 23-12-2008 at 11:11 PM. |
||
|
|
What's more dangerous 10km over or 10km under?
Threaded Mode