|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
View Poll Results: Which of these 4 would you buy instead of a Falcon | |||
Holden Commodore | 91 | 0.88% | |
Mitsubishi 380 | 63 | 0.61% | |
Toyota Camry | 3 | 0.03% | |
Toyota Aurion | 64 | 0.62% | |
Fiat Bambino | 10,016 | 97.21% | |
Spaceship | 66 | 0.64% | |
Voters: 10303. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-05-2007, 08:54 PM | #1 | ||
1999 Ford Fairmont Ghia
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,162
|
I drive a lot of base model cars at work so I thought I would give my 2 cents and see what youz reckon.
Ford Falcon BF Pros: -Brilliant engine has bucketloads of torque, likes to get up and go, likes to rev and sounds awesome -Transmission is awesome has the right gear ratios, doesnt clunk and has a proper manual mode -Handling is precise and predictable -Suspension absorbs bumbs and other road crap well -ABS actually works on gravel road -Fuel economy is pretty descent -Throttle response is brilliant Cons: -Exterior is starting to look pretty bland -Interior is too plasticky -Steering feels heavy (the AU steering feels much better) Holden Commodore VE Pros: -Its new so its something to talk about around the watercooler -Handling is pretty good. -Steering feel is pretty good -Suspension setup pretty compliant -Fuel economy an improvement -Pretty roomy inside Cons: -In base model trim it is a really ugly car with chunks, hubcaps, side flutes all conspiring to make it look like a tarted up street skank. -The engine lacks torque, doesnt like to rev and sounds wheezy and ****. -The transmission is clunky and crap. -Throttle response is still as crappy as VT -The interior looks cheap and plasticky -Quality is shithouse brand new cars shouldnt have problems. -Sometimes I have to drive it....... Mitsubishi 380 Pros: -Engine is pretty sweet with plenty of torque and a nice sound -Exterior styling pretty good for base model car -Interior not as bad as rivals -Ride pretty smooth Cons: -Steering not trustwothy -Gearbox ok but could be better -Dynamically being a big FWD you dont feel confident in it -Just an average car with nothing to brag about Toyota Camry Pros: -Looks pretty tough Cons: -Everything:seriously whats the big deal about this car a 4 cylinder might be all right in flat melbourne but when you have to go up a hill you get annoyed pretty quickly as the 4 struggles to move the fat ***** seriously I dont know why people dont buy a Mazda 6 instead Toyota Aurion Pros: -Looks pretty tough -Engine sounds pretty tough Cons: Where do I begin theres heaps so i will list a few biggies -Torqueless engine sounds tough but lacks testicles -That dicky gate shift and upside down manual mode -That crappy Torana style foot operated park brake -Cheap crappy interior -Crashy skittery ride -Stupid FWD dynamics: try chucking a U turn in a hurry These are my opinions and maybe the up spec models are better but since probly 70% oz car sales are fleet it desrves some attention. |
||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|