Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13-03-2008, 07:32 PM   #1
falcon_6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 156
Default What rights do i have

My daily driver a BF MK2 TURBO UTE RIPCURL IN BREEZE which is only 7 months old has sustained so far over 20,000 dollars in damage, due to a lovely old lady hitting me from behind at 60km/h.

Anyway I have been fighting with NRMA for 2 weeks now (considering the accident was 3 weeks ago) regarding my ute because they had no idea whether to total loss it or repair (not my choice in the end as i discovered).

2 day,s go they finally approved the repair and I,m concerned about NRMA shortcuts and prices given to the repairer.

Now what are my rights in regarding to how the repairer finishes my ute and if NRMA are cutting costs?

What do I do?

I am from the trade and basically have told both parties where I stand and will not take any and will not accept a poorly finished ute.

falcon_6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2008, 07:35 PM   #2
gu4800
Regular Member
 
gu4800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 494
Default

I believe that they have to return it to the condition it was in prior to the accident - no more, no less.

However, it as at their discretion as to whether new or used parts are used.

Cheers

Dan
__________________
BF XR6T in Ego - GOOOONE!

Current Drive: 2009 Audi S3 Sportback in Black
gu4800 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2008, 07:37 PM   #3
Jason[98.EL]
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Jason[98.EL]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 7,946
Default

just that

keep taking it back to the repairer if you are not happy

when my el got hit i took it back 5 times for little things

nrma will should not pay the repairer till you are happy thats what shannons did for me

i still have a small issue with mine but i am not sure what to do

jason
__________________
no longer have a ford but a ford man at heart
R.I.P 98 EL MAY YOU HAVE A GOOD LIFE IN FALCON HEAVEN

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Jason[98.EL] is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2008, 07:51 PM   #4
GS608
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ...in the shed
Posts: 3,386
Default

once its been in a crash its never going to be the same, id say get it fixed to the extent that its not noticeable that its had a prang, then offload it. if you can't do that, just keep taking it back till you're happy with it i suppose
GS608 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2008, 07:58 PM   #5
b2tf
not here much anymore
 
b2tf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
Default

NRMA are a bugger of a company to deal with in my experience - the fact that they cannot seem to decide whether yours should be written off or not proves it. A decent accessor can make the call typically on the spot.

I had a car insured with them before I had the ute, and the smash repairer told me a few things about them that basically made me cancel the policy the moment I got the car back, namely that NRMA prefer to repair instead of replace (so if yer bumper's stuffed, no new bumper, rather they will just plastic weld it etc), and they will also allow (and sometimes specify) the use of secondhand parts. Now how true that is I dont know and I didnt allow any of it to happen to my car, but it's definitely worth asking your repairer the question, and check what your policy says in the fine print.

Regardless of which company you insure with, t\you do have a right of return if you are not happy with the work, you should also have the right to choose which repairer does the work for you. NRMA did, at the time I had my claim, offer a lifetime warranty/guarantee on their repairs, so it would pay to check and see if this is still the case. If it is, you can take it back as many times as you like but be warned that they will only ever repair things a second time if you can a) show that it is a crap job, b) prove it was done during the initial repair, and c) not done by yourself after you get it back from the original repair job.
__________________
2024 F150 XLT
b2tf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2008, 08:07 PM   #6
J_Tank
Bring on the Boss
 
J_Tank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kuranda, FNQ
Posts: 915
Default

Probably because it's Breeze. Ford's most popular colour ever.
J_Tank is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2008, 08:20 PM   #7
Sorted
OzEcruisers PRESIDENT
 
Sorted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbz
Posts: 15,761
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: For all the contributions you make to the AFF community. 
Default

Being less that 12 months old I would assume NRMA have a new for old replacement of vehicle..... who knows they are as dodgy as RACV are............. Yes I despise them both!!

The plus factor you have here is that you have a third party that is at fault, who is their insurer???

As their insurer may be more willing to write your vehicle off than NRMA.

What NRMA would of worked out is what salvage dollar figure then can get for the wreck, how much it will cost the to buy a Brand New Vehicle of the Same Make and Model with the Same Accessories that were noted on the policy.

At the end of the day if its cheaper for them to write it off and replace it with a new vehicle they will, if its cheaper for them to repair it then they will take this option

You have a bargaining tool where the third party is at fault and will be up for the costs, all you have to do is hope they are insured and deemed at fault then you may be able them to swing it over to be written off

Get a Independent assessor to assess your vehicle and write a report if $20,000 is actually going to repair you car

FACT when they quote $20,000 this will not be the total costs of repairs, this is an estimate cost, they may still find other damage when they pull apart the car that will add to repair costs which they have not quoted on.

Your $20,000 may blow out to $25,000 after which its too late to opt for the new for old replacement vehicle and whe you sell your vehicle it will depreciate the value due to such a huge damage bill
__________________
1994 Ford Fairmont EF NA 6cyl Man 3.9 diff Sedan
PROEF 13.46 @ 105.78mph

Tuned by DYNOMOTIVE

200BUX - AFF Drag Nats 2019 EF Wagon
Quote:
Originally Posted by rednose View Post
Common knowledge that the more weight you take out of the car the less power you need to run the time.
Sorted is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2008, 08:49 PM   #8
NC1183
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
NC1183's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Moree, NSW
Posts: 2,076
Default

With the comment made about it being the repair's choice on whether to use new or aftermarket parts, i was told that for vehicals under 10 or 5 years old, new parts have to be used, from 5 or 10 (whatever it is) they can use aftermarket parts and then theres another age limit then you are allowed to use secondhand parts
__________________
Nathan

2005 FPV BF Super Pursuit

The new toy (now sold)
The SP


The old ute (sold)
www.aufalcon.com/nc1183

Build Thread


Quote:
Originally Posted by F6T
If you look closely you can see the remains of a Hyundai excel that’s been sucked into the intake.
about the pic of 'CHOP YA' F6
NC1183 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2008, 08:51 PM   #9
FrogInASock
Getahaircutandgetarealjob
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Newcastle area, NSW
Posts: 123
Default

Yair, I'm being picky, but...

NRMA Insurance is NOT the same company as NRMA (Road Service, holiday bookings, all that stuff). The insurance arm was bought a few years ago by Insurance Australia Group, who also own CGU.

A friend used to be in the accident repair industry in Wollongong. He got out while the going was good, but saw colleagues wrung dry by NRMA Insurance.
__________________
Te pilos recidene volo et opus solidus capere :
FrogInASock is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2008, 10:12 PM   #10
Yaw
Ford Fanatic
 
Yaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,480
Default

This is taken from the NRMA Product disclosure statement on page 55:

The Motor Vehicle Insurance and
Repair Industry Code of Conduct
Information for you
NRMA Insurance may authorise
the use of quality non-mechanical
reusable parts or non-genuine
parts. Our policy is to do this only
when this:
• is consistent with the age and
condition of the vehicle
• does not affect the safety or the
structural integrity of the vehicle
• complies with the vehicle
manufacturer’s specifications
and applicable Australian Design
Rules
• does not adversely affect the
post-repair appearance of the
vehicle
• does not void or affect the
warranty provided by the vehicle
manufacturer
Generally, we do not authorise the
use of reusable parts for the repair
of any motor vehicle that is less than
three years old.
In repairing your vehicle, we may
arrange for a part of the repair to
be carried out by a specialist service
provider, for example windscreen
repairs.
Continued next column
We offer a lifetime guarantee on the
workmanship of repairs we authorise.
For more information see page 71
You may choose your own repairer. For
more information, see the ‘Repairing
your vehicle’ section on pages 70-71
Our commitment to you
We support the code and are committed
to continually reviewing our operations
to ensure compliance.

This is taken from page 6 of the PDS:
Accidental damage
✓ Comprehensive
✓ Touring Caravan or Trailer
If your vehicle suffers accidental
damage or damage caused by a
collision
we will
decide whether to
 repair your vehicle, or
 replace your vehicle, or
 pay you the cost of repairing
your vehicle, or
 pay you
• the agreed value, or
• the market value
depending on the cover shown on
your current Certificate of Insurance

So your answer in short is NRMA can choose at THIER discretion to use second hand parts however generally for a vehicle less than 3 years old this is not the case, and you get a life time warranty on workmanship of repairs they authorise. They also have discretion over wether to repair or pay the sum insured or in this case replace the vehicle.

Product disclosure statements are easy enough to find on the net, they are your best source of information and they are what your insurer MUST abide by.

This is why they ALWAYS, ALWAYS say consider the PDS before making a descion about taking out the insurance.

You are ALWAYS best off going through your own insurer and getting any benifits your policy offers. A third party insurer would most likley come up with the same descion your own insurer has as they would look at all the same determining facts.
__________________
Everyone is entitled to my Opinion
2007 Territory TX SY RWD Ego

Last edited by Yaw; 13-03-2008 at 10:23 PM.
Yaw is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2008, 10:20 PM   #11
King Nothing
He has, the Knack..
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,042
Default

Regarding lifetime warranty, be very careful. In your case it should be ok, but if anyone ever has a cheaper accident be careful. I had 2 small accidents in a short space of time (one my fault, one not). They (NRMA) told me to pay the repairer direct for the portion I was at fault for. I had all sorts of trouble with the repairer, complained, and NRMA told me that the lifetime warranty is for AUTHOIRISED REPAIRS with the REPAIRER, NOT the NRMA! So if the repairer went out of business, too bad for me. And in their view, I had authorised the repairs (not the nrma!) because I had paid them, not the nrma. Lesson: Pay the nrma, then they authorise the repair, not yourself. Bastards.
__________________
2010 BF MKIII Falcon wagon "EGO"

Workhorse, stock as a rock

2004 BA MKI Futura - Now the wife's

For Show: 18" Kaotic Shadow Chrome, King SL all round, Cadence Amp, Kenwood 12" Sub, JL Audio 5x7's, Scuff Plates, MP3 Connector

For Go: SVI LPG, K&N Filter, F6 CAI, XR6T snorkle, XR8 catback, Magnaflow metal cat, Pacemaker headers, Underdrive, Thermostat, Custom tune, DBA4000

Now with baby seat and toys


175.6 rwkw

www.bseries.com.au/King_Nothing
King Nothing is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2008, 10:41 PM   #12
3vXT
...
 
3vXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,046
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRHEMI
You have a bargaining tool where the third party is at fault and will be up for the costs, all you have to do is hope they are insured and deemed at fault then you may be able them to swing it over to be written off
Its not really up to the old lady's insurance company (or herself if she doesn't have comprehensive insurance) to decide if his car is a write off or not. If his policy is with the nrma then its their decision.
In fact, if he has comprehensive insurance it should be irrelevant what kind of insurance she has if any.

I'm assuming she is the at fault driver, thats how it sounded anyway.
3vXT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2008, 10:52 PM   #13
fmc351
let it burn
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: QUEENSLANDER!!!!!
Posts: 2,866
Default

Doesnt help now, but you have the right to change insurer if youre not happy with them.
fmc351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2008, 11:31 PM   #14
Nickxb
XB in progress
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 296
Default

Also another view, if you are not happy with the repairs and the insurer refuses to have the vehicle re-repaired, you will be able to ask for an internal dispute review.

Once the internal review is complete if you are not satisfied ask for a final decision letter and contact the insurance ombudsman. They are a government authority and may be able to review it for you.

However before doing any of this, get your own quote from your own repairer. Even if their quote is cheaper, you can cross check the scope of works and make sure both repairers are going to repair the same things.

Hope this helps

Nick
Nickxb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2008, 04:30 AM   #15
Ridin-High
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Penrith, Sydney
Posts: 301
Default

falcon 6, doesn't NRMA let you choose who u want to repair ur car? Their are some good smash repair mobs around.

free plug for kingsgrove smash repairs
__________________
"I've got 2 Blow off valves, their for the chicks bro"

Ps. Yes i have used the search button mum....
Ridin-High is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2008, 11:53 AM   #16
woodsy109
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken2903
Its not really up to the old lady's insurance company (or herself if she doesn't have comprehensive insurance) to decide if his car is a write off or not. If his policy is with the nrma then its their decision.
In fact, if he has comprehensive insurance it should be irrelevant what kind of insurance she has if any.

I'm assuming she is the at fault driver, thats how it sounded anyway.
Wrong. You can do it that way but because she was at fault, you can claim on her insurance, if she has it and is cooperative. You claim on your insurance when they other party doesn't have insurance, or is disputing the claim. In that case your insurance company would then chase them up for the money.
woodsy109 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2008, 12:44 PM   #17
LTDHO
The one and only
 
LTDHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Carrum Downs, Victoria
Posts: 9,053
Default

I love reading these 'insurance threads' great laugh.. (except those who do know their stuff.)
__________________
1992 DC LTDHO 360rwkw built by me
Tuned by CVE Performance
Going of the rails on a crazy train
Other cars include Dynamic ED Sprint, Dynamic DL LTD, Sparkling Burgundy DL LTD, Yellow, Red & Blue XB sedan & Black XB Coupe
LTDHO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2008, 12:49 PM   #18
gtfpv
GT
 
gtfpv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
Default

you have right of repairer in this case, so go and talk to the panel beater of your choice, and disguss it with him. you will get one that looks after you. the nrma have no right on what parts go on the car. the car is relatively new anyway.
gtfpv is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2008, 12:52 PM   #19
3vXT
...
 
3vXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,046
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woodsy109
Wrong. You can do it that way but because she was at fault, you can claim on her insurance, if she has it and is cooperative. You claim on your insurance when they other party doesn't have insurance, or is disputing the claim. In that case your insurance company would then chase them up for the money.
I've never heard of that before and i sure as hell wouldn't trust someone else or their insurance company to pay up. Whats the point of having insurance if you aren't going to use it when you have an accident?
3vXT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2008, 12:52 PM   #20
gtfpv
GT
 
gtfpv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
Default

also if possible , speak to the assessor.
gtfpv is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2008, 02:12 PM   #21
P6LTD351
Blue Blood
 
P6LTD351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SA
Posts: 1,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken2903
I've never heard of that before and i sure as hell wouldn't trust someone else or their insurance company to pay up. Whats the point of having insurance if you aren't going to use it when you have an accident?

I agree with you mate. Your insurance company goes after the other person's insurance company. Why would I pay for insurance just to have the hassle to go through the other party's company.
P6LTD351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2008, 02:30 PM   #22
Sorted
OzEcruisers PRESIDENT
 
Sorted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbz
Posts: 15,761
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: For all the contributions you make to the AFF community. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eb2monty
I agree with you mate. Your insurance company goes after the other person's insurance company. Why would I pay for insurance just to have the hassle to go through the other party's company.
Well apparently he has a dodgy insurance company that’s going to use second hand parts (if they choose to) and is going to repair his car for $20,000 plus and does not give him choice of repairer, in this instance I would of at least found out who the third party insurer is and looked at other options.

In most cases yes you would sit back and let your insurance company do all the work.

There is not a clause in your insurance policy that says if you have an accident you must claim though your insurer, you can claim direct off a third party insurer.

And at the end of the day NRMA does not own the vehicle so the AFF member can choose how he wants to make a recovery for his loss, be that through NRMA or through the Third Party's insurer.
__________________
1994 Ford Fairmont EF NA 6cyl Man 3.9 diff Sedan
PROEF 13.46 @ 105.78mph

Tuned by DYNOMOTIVE

200BUX - AFF Drag Nats 2019 EF Wagon
Quote:
Originally Posted by rednose View Post
Common knowledge that the more weight you take out of the car the less power you need to run the time.
Sorted is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2008, 06:27 PM   #23
3vXT
...
 
3vXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,046
Default

^^^ But how can he make a claim through someone elses insurance policy? He doesn't have a contract with them, he's never given them any money.
I think most insurance companies have pretty similar rules or whatever anyway, when it comes to repairing cars. Post #10 looks almost identical to whats in my pds and i've never been with the nrma.
3vXT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2008, 06:49 PM   #24
woodsy109
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken2903
^^^ But how can he make a claim through someone elses insurance policy? He doesn't have a contract with them, he's never given them any money.
I think most insurance companies have pretty similar rules or whatever anyway, when it comes to repairing cars. Post #10 looks almost identical to whats in my pds and i've never been with the nrma.
If someone is in the wrong, they can make a claim against their insurance for both their vehicle and the vehicle they damaged. Thats if they admit they are in the wrong and organise it with their insurance. If not then you have no choice but to go through your insurer and make them do the hard yards to get their money back.
woodsy109 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2008, 07:05 PM   #25
bob^
LPS
 
bob^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Geelong
Posts: 1,601
Default

Correct, when my old car got hit, the girl who hit it contacted her insurance company to inform then of the accident, then I rang them up to finalise all the details for the repair.
bob^ is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2008, 07:33 PM   #26
3vXT
...
 
3vXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,046
Default

If i was in that position though, being the not at fault driver, i wouldn't really care what the other driver did re their insurance. Actually, it wouldn't make much difference to me other than having to cough up the excess if i was the one that caused the accident. I pay almost $1000 a year to be covered for exactly these things.
If i was involved in an accident, i contact my insurance company with the details of the car and driver and the incident and its up to them to either,

If i'm not at fault - fix my car, chase the other driver/drivers insurance company/whoever for the costs or

If i am at fault - fix my car, pay for the other drivers car when their insurance fixes their car and chase me up for the excess.

When you pay for your insurance every year, you are choosing who you want to take care of this stuff for you when you have an accident. The pds's are available before you hand over the money.
I can't see them using 2nd hand parts on a car that is so new, I always assumed that was only for slightly older cars.

If the OP has some choice which repairer he uses, pick one you trust, if you aren't happy with the work take it back to the place it was fixed and ask them what was done, complain to the insurance company (they are the ones paying for the work), then the ombudsman.
3vXT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2008, 08:21 PM   #27
fmc351
let it burn
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: QUEENSLANDER!!!!!
Posts: 2,866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken2903
If i was in that position though, being the not at fault driver, i wouldn't really care what the other driver did re their insurance. Actually, it wouldn't make much difference to me other than having to cough up the excess if i was the one that caused the accident. I pay almost $1000 a year to be covered for exactly these things.
If i was involved in an accident, i contact my insurance company with the details of the car and driver and the incident and its up to them to either,

If i'm not at fault - fix my car, chase the other driver/drivers insurance company/whoever for the costs or

If i am at fault - fix my car, pay for the other drivers car when their insurance fixes their car and chase me up for the excess.

When you pay for your insurance every year, you are choosing who you want to take care of this stuff for you when you have an accident. The pds's are available before you hand over the money.
I can't see them using 2nd hand parts on a car that is so new, I always assumed that was only for slightly older cars.

If the OP has some choice which repairer he uses, pick one you trust, if you aren't happy with the work take it back to the place it was fixed and ask them what was done, complain to the insurance company (they are the ones paying for the work), then the ombudsman.
I agree. If you get choice of repairer etc, then why would you use someone elses policy? Hand it over to your insurance company and get on with life, thats what its for.

If you dont have choice of repairer, or their insurance is superior to yours, and you still have reason to complain, maybe you should make better insurance choices. In essence, youre under-insured, and so are they. How can you expect a good outcome or the insurer to pay more than they agreed and set premiums for with the policy holder?
fmc351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2008, 09:08 PM   #28
cycle myth
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 276
Default

There is another alternative (not sure if raised already).

You could choose your own repairer however NRMA would only pay the amount that they are going to pay through their own repair network.

You would also lose any rights against them for things like repairs guarantee etc.

However if you have a good relationship with a repairer, can get a good price for the quality of work you expect and can justify any price difference and loss of benefits this might be a good bet.

This may impact on your excess and you may need to challenge the at fault party to get it back.

If you are particular this is what I would do.
cycle myth is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2008, 12:34 AM   #29
Yaw
Ford Fanatic
 
Yaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woodsy109
Wrong. You can do it that way but because she was at fault, you can claim on her insurance, if she has it and is cooperative. You claim on your insurance when they other party doesn't have insurance, or is disputing the claim. In that case your insurance company would then chase them up for the money.
THIS IS WRONG

Now before you jump up and down, read what I have to say.
The other persons insurance company does NOT have to repair your car. Thier only OBLIGATION UNDER LAW is to compensate your loss after you mitigate your loss. DO NOT confuse this with the fact that most insurers will offer thier services to repair your car...THEY DO NOT HAVE TO!!!!!

What they are perfectly in thier rights to do is say to you, get a quote, send it to us along with a letter of demand, Our assessor will look at the repair (either already done and paid for or just quoted) and adjust the quote to what is fair and reasonable, Then send you a realese form that you sign basically saying once we pay you $xxxx you have no further claim to this and then pay you out the fair and reasonable amount. (that way they do not have to worry about gauranteeing the work. any issue you have from there is your problem.

So once again to clarify what I have said, THE OTHER PERSONS INSURANCE COMPANY ONLY NEEDS TO COMPENSATE YOUR LOSS-----NOT REPAIR YOUR VEHICLE>
__________________
Everyone is entitled to my Opinion
2007 Territory TX SY RWD Ego
Yaw is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2008, 12:53 AM   #30
aussiblue
FG XR6 Ute & Sedan
Donating Member3
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bibra Lake WA
Posts: 23,573
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Has been floating around the oze tech section for a long time and is always there to give advice when people have an issue. 
Default

Under most policies you are not obliged to claim against any insurer just advise your insurer that the car was involved in an accident. Your car is your property and there are limits on what even insureres can make you do with it.

I always get several quotes (but usually do the work myself); invoice the other person on the basis of the written estimates. The other person sends it to their insurer who after assessing my car, settles with me for a negotiated cash figure on the basis I acknowledge in writing I have no further claims against the other driver.

As required under my policy I advise my insurer (not claim) and they examine my car before and after the repair to ensure it is up to standard (and as I use all new parts and take more care and time its always considered better than industry standard). It also means I have the car when I need it and choose the repair times.

Even if you don't want to do it yourself this approach allows you to choose your repairer, pay a bit more for a quality job if you wish and manage the repair contract - although a lot of panel beaters won't play as they prefer insurance jobs. You may find some repair shops will play but demand a credit card authorisation before they start as a guarantee of receiving payment.

This approach also gives the other party the option of paying you rather than claiming against their insurer (usually only for lower cost prangs) or as I have found in one case the other driver worked in the car industry and settled on the basis of providing all the new parts I needed and paying me the cash difference between the parts cost of the quote and the labor component.
__________________
regards Blue

Last edited by aussiblue; 15-03-2008 at 12:58 AM.
aussiblue is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL