Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16-10-2005, 03:46 PM   #1
SSbaby
Banned
 
SSbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 689
Default VE SS to nudge 300kW?

Read under 'Holden and HSV'...



__________________
Rep Power: 0
SSbaby is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 03:55 PM   #2
DJM83
Barra Turbo > V8
Donating Member3
 
DJM83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26,336
Default

yeah read it i think its all about an EGO problem over at fishermans bend
__________________
-2011 XR6 Turbo Ute - Lux Pack - M6
-2022 Hyundai Tucson Highlander Diesel N Line
DJM83 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 04:03 PM   #3
SSbaby
Banned
 
SSbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 689
Default

I'm not sure that it's an ego problem... but the 'problem' for Holden is that the 6.0L LS2 is already in a mild state of tune... it could easily accept headers and decent exhaust and exceed 330kW.

That's why I believe the 5.3L will easily fulfill Holden's requirements but I think that by stocking common inventories for the LS2 (instead of two distinct engine lines), Holden and its dealers are able to reduce their costs.
__________________
Rep Power: 0
SSbaby is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 09:08 PM   #4
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSbaby
I'm not sure that it's an ego problem... but the 'problem' for Holden is that the 6.0L LS2 is already in a mild state of tune... it could easily accept headers and decent exhaust and exceed 330kW.

That's why I believe the 5.3L will easily fulfill Holden's requirements but I think that by stocking common inventories for the LS2 (instead of two distinct engine lines), Holden and its dealers are able to reduce their costs.
With Euro 3 noise regs it's not that easy to just put a higher flowing exhaust anymore. I think the SS will be de tuned just like the VT was, with maybe 270 kw to start with, an then we'll see the usual Holden add 5 kw with every model b*ll that gets the bogans excited.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-10-2005, 05:46 AM   #5
banarcus
hmm eyebrows
 
banarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lower Hunter Valley, NSW
Posts: 2,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
With Euro 3 noise regs it's not that easy to just put a higher flowing exhaust anymore. I think the SS will be de tuned just like the VT was, with maybe 270 kw to start with, an then we'll see the usual Holden add 5 kw with every model b*ll that gets the bogans excited.
Exactly my take of this. Why would they put all their cards on the table first up?
__________________
XE 4.9 Falcon S & XA 4.9 Fairmont hardtop
banarcus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-10-2005, 06:00 PM   #6
Quadcams
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Quadcams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Working, chasing after my daughter and working
Posts: 3,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSbaby
I'm not sure that it's an ego problem... but the 'problem' for Holden is that the 6.0L LS2 is already in a mild state of tune... it could easily accept headers and decent exhaust and exceed 330kW.
Mate mild state of tune I've raced a LS2 with full exaust, cai and edit by a well known tuner kicked his *** there not that much chop also his mph was about the same as mine what does that tell ya definatly not 330+kw.
Quadcams is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 04:39 PM   #7
Falcon Coupe
Clevo Mafia Inc.
 
Falcon Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 10,496
Chairman's Award: Chairman's Award - Issue reason: The exceptional contribution made to AFF over an extended period of time. Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Your tireless efforts behind the scenes in keeping AFF the place it is. 
Default

They just keep getting better, but the cost of petrol nowdays takes away some of the exitment i used to feel when seeing a new more powerfull car coming our way.
Falcon Coupe is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 05:28 PM   #8
aimzes
...fairly odd
 
aimzes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: mcdonalds college of hamburger knowledge
Posts: 901
Default

i think its pretty silly to have a car like the SS (or even and XR8) come from the factory with 300kw. i mean where the f is it gonna end and how much more power will the hsv's or fpv's need to have. also how fast does a factory performance sedan need to go?

but then again, 300kw is what a 6.0 should be punching out.

eh dont mind me im probably talking absolute nonsence... im all for tuning cars and stuff but i dunno if a $50k sedan needs that much power from the factory...
__________________
1992 EB Falcon 5.0 V8. mods; dust, dirt, cobwebs, scratches, trolley dents, dented bonnet, gutter scrapes, rattly exhaust, and floor mats.
aimzes is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 09:02 PM   #9
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aimzes
i think its pretty silly to have a car like the SS (or even and XR8) come from the factory with 300kw. i mean where the f is it gonna end and how much more power will the hsv's or fpv's need to have. also how fast does a factory performance sedan need to go?

...

Wouldn't Holden and Ford start to reduce the capacity of the engines??
To get alot of power (for a stock production car) with a smaller engine capacity (like in europe) would help them with the price of fuel. They should be able to increase the fuel efficiency of the car.
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 09:27 PM   #10
Falchoon
Regular Member
 
Falchoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In a house
Posts: 498
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aimzes
i think its pretty silly to have a car like the SS (or even and XR8) come from the factory with 300kw. i mean where the f is it gonna end and how much more power will the hsv's or fpv's need to have. also how fast does a factory performance sedan need to go?

but then again, 300kw is what a 6.0 should be punching out.

eh dont mind me im probably talking absolute nonsence... im all for tuning cars and stuff but i dunno if a $50k sedan needs that much power from the factory...
They need so much power to drag their lard ar$es around. Each new car seems to be heavier than the last model even though half of the car is made of plastic. The new cars aren't neccesarily any quicker than the previous model because of this weight, which is due to extras like a/c, p/s, power windows, Brembo brakes etc.
Falchoon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 09:32 PM   #11
SSbaby
Banned
 
SSbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falchoon
They need so much power to drag their lard ar$es around. Each new car seems to be heavier than the last model even though half of the car is made of plastic. The new cars aren't neccesarily any quicker than the previous model because of this weight, which is due to extras like a/c, p/s, power windows, Brembo brakes etc.
That's a good point. VE with LS2 might not be any faster than a VZ LS1.
__________________
Rep Power: 0
SSbaby is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 10:36 PM   #12
Ryan
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 3,926
Default

Mmmmm some peopole have made good points in this thread.

If the VE SSs get 300Kw I wonder what the HSV models get?

Could we see power of atleast 320-350Kw from HSVs? I dont think it would would happen though.
Ryan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2005, 03:27 PM   #13
Bangers
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aimzes
but then again, 300kw is what a 6.0 should be punching out.
Yeh, 300kw for an untuned, highly inefficent 6L, sounds about right.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2005, 04:36 PM   #14
Bucket
XR5 Pilot
 
Bucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Perth, Ex NSW
Posts: 1,455
Default

Is it just me or do Ford do a lot more work to get the power out of the 5.4L mill than Holden with their 6.0L job?? Seems to me like Holden just pull out a screw driver, get under the hood and turn the "more power" screw a couple of notches and viola! a 300Kw SS... I dont think Ford AU play the same game as GMH. Sure, they're (ford au) all about improving the current product..but they do it a bit differently to GMH...Correct me if im wrong (and i dont mind saying that I am often) but it seems like Ford AU are more about building a quality car with power whilst GMH (or as it seems, until recently) have been all about building a car with the most grunt on the market and only now GMH are matching Ford with the complexity of Parts being used in the VE (ie. Control Blade Vs. the new IRS from GM)...just wait for the all new falcon in 07 i say...Ford had their time in the sun (and boy was it good (COTY...3rd in PCOTY) with the BA and as a lot of people are saying..how do you improve on something so good? they probably could of easily funded a serious redevelopment of the Boss engine with the BF but isnt that money better spent on the 07 Falcon?? just give the 6 Speed Auto and new refinements in the BF a chance before we say much more about the official figures from both Ford and Holden and their new toys that havent even been released yet...we're arguing over the hypothetical...some hype from a magazine artical posted by a GMH fan that may have just wanted to see us all squirm :voldar02:
Bucket is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 05:32 PM   #15
twr7cx
Member
 
twr7cx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
Posts: 1,991
Default

Will this not end up like the days of the Phase III were the Phase 4 was banned or what ever due to the high output?

What sort of performance figures will the HSV's be pushing out then? And whats Ford gunna bite back with?
__________________
Current vehicles: MY12 Land Rover Discovery 4 TDV6, MY03 Land Rover Discovery 2 HSE Td5 off road modified and 1989 Mazda NA MX-5 toy car.
Previously: 1992 Ford EBII Fairmont, 1994 Ford EF Falcon XR6 supercharged, 2003 Ford BA Falcon XR6 Turbo 325rwkw, and 2002 Ford AU3 Falcon XR8 Pursuit 250 270rwkw.
twr7cx is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2005, 08:37 PM   #16
xf_vanner
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: melbourne
Posts: 119
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by twr7cx
Will this not end up like the days of the Phase III were the Phase 4 was banned or what ever due to the high output?

What sort of performance figures will the HSV's be pushing out then? And whats Ford gunna bite back with?

I was thinking the same thing i think its gonna happen all ova again
xf_vanner is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 05:52 PM   #17
galaxy xr8
Giddy up.
 
galaxy xr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kramerica Industries.
Posts: 15,641
Default

If they go to 300kw for the plain jane SS, that doesn't leave them much room for the HSV variant's, this kw power can not keep going on like it is, I am glad Ford/FPV did not increase their kw number's in an attampt to win bragging right's.
galaxy xr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 05:54 PM   #18
HEMI POWER
N/A BOSS 390+
 
HEMI POWER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSbaby
Read under 'Holden and HSV'...

Oh god i wonder what this will do to all those poor GTS owners that folked out 100k for there vechiles.Holden and HSV look after your customers first before trying to take up a Battle that can't be won. :
__________________
WOOOOOOOOOO
FPV GT 03 /341 RWKW OF N/A POWER.
XB GT 73 /OLD FORD MUSCLE
ALL AUSSIE MUSCLE
HEMI POWER is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 08:45 PM   #19
SSbaby
Banned
 
SSbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FPVGT
Oh god i wonder what this will do to all those poor GTS owners that folked out 100k for there vechiles.Holden and HSV look after your customers first before trying to take up a Battle that can't be won. :
Don't worry about the HSV owners... look at your car's depreciation fall. :
__________________
Rep Power: 0
SSbaby is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-10-2005, 02:32 AM   #20
jmc-007
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FPVGT
Oh god i wonder what this will do to all those poor GTS owners that folked out 100k for there vechiles.Holden and HSV look after your customers first before trying to take up a Battle that can't be won. :

What can you do, people need to realise they need to go forward.

Just because they brought a VXII 300kw GTS back in 2002 !!!! doesnt mean HSV should have to stop at 297 in the current vz series.

These days i think even HSV and FPV need to chase as many people as they can.

Days are gone of the limited run GT and special run cars.

Not too mention that cars are a bad investment unless its something classic.

(unless you do a lease to save you money) etc etc

Last edited by jmc-007; 17-10-2005 at 02:33 AM. Reason: more info
jmc-007 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2005, 05:04 PM   #21
smciner1
Detroit Locker Equiped TM
 
smciner1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Area 51 (tm)
Posts: 4,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmc-007
What can you do, people need to realise they need to go forward.

Just because they brought a VXII 300kw GTS back in 2002 !!!! doesnt mean HSV should have to stop at 297 in the current vz series.

These days i think even HSV and FPV need to chase as many people as they can.

Days are gone of the limited run GT and special run cars.

Not too mention that cars are a bad investment unless its something classic.

(unless you do a lease to save you money) etc etc
VT II was the first 300 kw GTS.
__________________
Apollo Blue 1974 XB Falcon GT, 557 HP
Blue Pearl 2004 BA FPV GT, 290 kW

Quote:
Originally Posted by MRJUCY
Simple give the car a rev & have a listen a Windsor makes a sort of wheezy drone similar to an angry Hugh Grant when a Clevo will sound like Satan has woke up with a hangover & realized he is out of coffee & cigarettes
Falcon GT Club of Geelong.
http://www.facebook.com/FalconGTClubGeelong
smciner1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 05:59 PM   #22
M14A-Mclaren
Foo Fighter
 
M14A-Mclaren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wellington, NZ
Posts: 3,740
Default

Power doesnt impress me that much anymore, sure as long as its up there like FPV is basically at now thats good. What really impresses me is a cars handling. I think they should be pushing in the cornering, braking and comfort, probably in that order.
M14A-Mclaren is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2005, 05:59 PM   #23
gtfpv
GT
 
gtfpv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
Default

it is good to see . if a merc or bm can produce 383 kws in a lighter car and do 11,s down the 400m i cant see the problem with 300kw holdens and fords doing 12 - 13's.
gtfpv is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-10-2005, 08:20 AM   #24
ltd
Force Fed Fords
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtfpv
it is good to see . if a merc or bm can produce 383 kws in a lighter car and do 11,s down the 400m i cant see the problem with 300kw holdens and fords doing 12 - 13's.
I can. Mercs or BMW's that have that much power are prohibitavely costly, meaning that your average hoon can't afford to get behind the wheel. If you make it so that any idiot with 50 grand can get behind the wheel of something that powerful then the horror high speed smashes witnessed today in cars like the WRX and Nissan GT's are easily going to transcend down the line to Aussie V8's.

Given the fact that Holden drivers are typically more inclined to be hoons and behave more like a yobbo than an intelligent person, I can only foresee a higher representation of commodores in street racing, ramraids and high speed smashes from little Ahmed losing it on his P's.

Also, the fact that every poor bastard who bought a HSV is going to be Usurped by a lower line model will mean that the resale on all of these models will drop like a stone.
Moreover, isn't this the problem with Holden overall?
I mean, they release a model like the VY, and then 5 months later release the VYII. Every time they do this the poor bastard who owns one of these cars loses an extra 3 grand on the resale even before the car has aged a couple of months.

Anyway, Holden will be interesting to watch as all is not well at GMC with huge losses globally, and their supposed jewel GMH has already been told to "significantly reduce costs". GMC have also only approved 500 million of the 1 billion VE program for GMH, and they are still fighting about it.

Just one of the reasons for their downsizing and sending a lot of work offshore to Korea. In years to come we may see Holden become a fully imported brand as the commodore is now the only model made here, and with the VE only between 45-55% will be local content. I read a story on this in the AFR and I will try to scan it to put it up online.
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley


Quote:
Powered by GE
ltd is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-10-2005, 11:23 AM   #25
SSbaby
Banned
 
SSbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 689
Default

I think that if Holden do come out with a 300kW SS, depreciation won't be not immune to FPV either, purely from the point of view that HSV and FPV are both direct competitors. Do members here recall how Tickford's depreciation values and sales suffered in comparision to HSV's when the LS1 was first introduced?

GTS resales were also strong for a time... then when people were editing their LS1s and having superior numbers than C4B... the sales nosedived and so too depreciation.
__________________
Rep Power: 0
SSbaby is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-10-2005, 01:00 PM   #26
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ltd
I can. Mercs or BMW's that have that much power are prohibitavely costly, meaning that your average hoon can't afford to get behind the wheel. If you make it so that any idiot with 50 grand can get behind the wheel of something that powerful then the horror high speed smashes witnessed today in cars like the WRX and Nissan GT's are easily going to transcend down the line to Aussie V8's.

Given the fact that Holden drivers are typically more inclined to be hoons and behave more like a yobbo than an intelligent person, I can only foresee a higher representation of commodores in street racing, ramraids and high speed smashes from little Ahmed losing it on his P's.
Thanks for clearing that up, I didn't realize driver skill was based on the salary of the driver... Now I understand, thank you. Gee if we all just get payrises, the world will become a safer place!
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-10-2005, 01:07 PM   #27
Dave_au
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern Sydney
Posts: 1,908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevypower
Thanks for clearing that up, I didn't realize driver skill was based on the salary of the driver... Now I understand, thank you. Gee if we all just get payrises, the world will become a safer place!
Driver skill no, but demographs yes - I would doubt not many BMW M5s or E55 AMGs do burnouts on public roads. Wealthier demographs tend to be more law abiding. :
Dave_au is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-10-2005, 01:18 PM   #28
4Vman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
4Vman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave_au
Driver skill no, but demographs yes - I would doubt not many BMW M5s or E55 AMGs do burnouts on public roads. Wealthier demographs tend to be more law abiding. :
I agree, the demographic of the consumer can be a GENERAL guide to attitude and behaviour.
Its not perfect but its a guide, as said someone who spends 150K on a car isn't likely to add 3 subs, a blow off valve and do "fully sic" burnouts everywhere while draging every second guy at the lights..



__________________
335 S/C GT: The new KING of Australian made performance cars..
4Vman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-10-2005, 05:59 PM   #29
ltd
Force Fed Fords
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevypower
Thanks for clearing that up, I didn't realize driver skill was based on the salary of the driver... Now I understand, thank you. Gee if we all just get payrises, the world will become a safer place!
Try this on for size.

Salary is by in large proportional to age and maturity, ie. If someone can afford to spend 200k on a car with 300kw plus, they are likely to be a little more mature and not absolutely thrash the death out of their 200k investment. Contrarily, some relatively inexperienced hot head buys a 50k commonwhore with little regard to their investment, and ends up dragging every car at the lights, weaving in and out of traffic, and speeding on every road they can. Who is more inclined to lose it or have an accident?
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley


Quote:
Powered by GE

Last edited by russellw; 20-10-2005 at 07:25 PM. Reason: Breach of site T&C
ltd is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-10-2005, 07:44 PM   #30
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ltd
If ignorance is bliss then you my friend must be orgasmic.

Try this on for size.

Salary is by in large proportional to age and maturity, ie. If someone can afford to spend 200k on a car with 300kw plus, they are likely to be a little more mature and not absolutely thrash the death out of their 200k investment. Contrarily, some relatively inexperienced hot head buys a 50k commonwhore with little regard to their investment, and ends up dragging every car at the lights, weaving in and out of traffic, and speeding on every road they can. Who is more inclined to lose it or have an accident?

Next time before you patronise one of my posts, try rubbing your two IQ points together and see if they start a fire.
Ouch! Just use personal attacks, if it makes you feel any better.

Last edited by russellw; 20-10-2005 at 07:25 PM.
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL