Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24-03-2008, 04:50 PM   #1
imugli
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 531
Default Ford to revive rear-wheel drive in U.S.

Found this on detnews.com

http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll...803240338/1148

I love the way they say there isn't any money to be saved in doing the development here (presumably due to the currency situation).

Question...

If you spend US$3billion developing something that I could do for US$2billion - does that not represent a saving??? Just goes to show that some people just don't learn...

Here's my prediction... Next falc will no doubt be some soft-as pig that only handles in a straight line and steers like an oil tanker... :

imugli is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-03-2008, 05:12 PM   #2
GS608
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ...in the shed
Posts: 3,386
Default

it may not be developed/produced here but most of the Ford Oz team will be working on it, weather that be in the states or here.
GS608 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-03-2008, 05:14 PM   #3
1970XW351
Angry Dub Driver
 
1970XW351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toowoomba
Posts: 560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR-CHIEF
it may not be developed/produced here but most of the Ford Oz team will be working on it, weather that be in the states or here.
That may be true, but no doubt the American heads will have the final say. And they tend to be rather shortsighted, arrogant and unable to accept advice when it comes to their products shortcomings.
1970XW351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-03-2008, 05:43 PM   #4
CADSKY
'01 AU11 XR8 UTE
 
CADSKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 1,316
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1970XW351
That may be true, but no doubt the American heads will have the final say. And they tend to be rather shortsighted, arrogant and unable to accept advice when it comes to their products shortcomings.
lol i think you just summed up the american population in one sentence :
__________________
WILLOWBANK PB
BF MK11 XR6
14.175 @ 99.49mph

CURRENT
'01 AU2 XR8 UTE - 5 SPEED MANUAL.
MUCH WORK TO DO.

PREVIOUS
'07 BF MK11 XR6 - 6 SPEED AUTO
'95 EF XR6 - 5 SPEED MANUAL

See my car HERE
CADSKY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-03-2008, 05:50 PM   #5
Paxton
Cobblers!
 
Paxton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Shire, NSW
Posts: 4,489
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swan_ford
lol i think you just summed up the american population in one sentence :
But all of the FoMoCo brass is an awe of the FG. Mullally was reported to (although not false) be getting an G6ET as his company car. I think Australia will have very close ties to this car (as it will have some similarities to the FG platform), but whether it is developed here or in the USA we don't know. I know Ford won't let us go backwards in terms of suspensions or drivetrains (Except for the V6), no matter where the car is developed. I expect Mustang with IRS.
__________________
Ego BFII Ghia
Titanium Silver E53 X5 4.4i
Gunmetal EF XR6. Now retired from active duty.
Roses are red. Violets are blue. OS X rocks. Homage to you.
Paxton is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 02:25 AM   #6
DanielXR8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,451
Default Ford developing new rear-drive platform in Dearborn

If this news is correct, then looks like next gen Falcon is going back home so to speak and will be based on American designed platform. News story from Autoblog.

Ford has apparently finally heard the call and green-lighted development of a new global rear wheel drive platform and a family of vehicles to be built on it. However, unlike General Motors, Ford will not rely on its Australian division to do the heavy lifting. Since the collapse of the U.S. dollar has made the United States a low cost country, the development of the new platform has been moved back to Dearborn. The most recent attempt at a rear-drive architecture that debuted on the latest Australian Ford Falcon was something of a debacle for the company. Unlike Holden, which designed its RWD Zeta platform to be built in right- and left-hand-drive versions, the new Falcon platform is right-hand drive only. This new Ford architecture to be developed near Detroit, however, will spawn models for both the Ford and Lincoln brands, including an all-new Mustang. With Ford making a major push to reduce weight in future models, hopefully these new cars will come in a lot lighter than the GM equivalents, as well.
DanielXR8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 02:41 AM   #7
dom_105
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: St Kilda
Posts: 522
Default

Will be interesting to see how this all pans out.
dom_105 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 02:51 AM   #8
SpoolMan
Solution Was Boost 4?, 6 & 8
 
SpoolMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 23,624
Chairman's Award: Chairman's Award - Issue reason: The exceptional contribution made to AFF events and sponsorship. Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Everything you do to help this place run smoothly! Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: The awesome Technical and Service how to's in the FPV /XR6 /G6ET turbo threads..  and his own build threads that inspire people to have a go... enabling people to save money and realise the dream of working on their own cars as well. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielXR8
If this news is correct, then looks like next gen Falcon is going back home so to speak and will be based on American designed platform. News story from Autoblog.
The Falcon after the FG will be heavily shared with the Ford US development.
You cant sell 3000 cars a month and keep spending multi millions on development.
The rear wheel design will be a global platform, the V6 engine is from the US and possibly the auto will be too.
I haven't heard a code name for the next Falcon has anyone?
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

AUTOTECH TUNED EDELEBROCK CHARGED
2017 GT Mustang Plenty of RWKW
SpoolMan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 08:15 AM   #9
imugli
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 531
Default

See here...

http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11214443
imugli is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 10:06 AM   #10
SpoolMan
Solution Was Boost 4?, 6 & 8
 
SpoolMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 23,624
Chairman's Award: Chairman's Award - Issue reason: The exceptional contribution made to AFF events and sponsorship. Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Everything you do to help this place run smoothly! Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: The awesome Technical and Service how to's in the FPV /XR6 /G6ET turbo threads..  and his own build threads that inspire people to have a go... enabling people to save money and realise the dream of working on their own cars as well. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by imugli
Thanks thread is now been merged.

Quote:
Originally Posted by imugli
Here's my prediction... Next falc will no doubt be some soft-as pig that only handles in a straight line and steers like an oil tanker... :
We 1st must hope that this one FG does well, its a changing market they say Ford spend plenty on this FG Falcon so they need a decent return......fuel and running costs have made big car owners look twice at where there money goes.

Same deal for Ford they must evaluate were there development money is best spent if people are not buying a 6cyl Falcon, then development money is better spent in the small car sector more so with 4cyl Focus production starting in a couple of years at Broadmeadows.
We may not like our Falcon having a US influence, this will be needed to keep costs down on the declining big car market.

PS: even my dad just ordered an 2008 Focus.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

AUTOTECH TUNED EDELEBROCK CHARGED
2017 GT Mustang Plenty of RWKW
SpoolMan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 11:46 AM   #11
BLUEYBA
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
BLUEYBA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Western Sydney
Posts: 746
Default

Ford US have already tried killing off the Falcon without success so this is another way to do and you know it will work. For some reason they just can't handle that we build better cars than what they do
BLUEYBA is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 12:49 PM   #12
King Nothing
He has, the Knack..
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,042
Default

(My repost from the FG/Orion Hub forum)

Great. Last time we had american input on the style we wound up with this. The biggest disaster for FoA of all time.



Sorry to all you AU fans, nothing personal, but it didn't sell.

Now the yanks have input on our engine, we lose out torquey I6.

Now we are going to let them give us a RWD platform? Where their current "hero" RWD is based on a live axle rear end? Sure it will be upgraded, but how long will it languish for in the newer design? If I hang on to my current car for a while, then it looks like my next car will most likely be a holden! It'll be more aussie than the "huntsman" at this rate.
__________________
2010 BF MKIII Falcon wagon "EGO"

Workhorse, stock as a rock

2004 BA MKI Futura - Now the wife's

For Show: 18" Kaotic Shadow Chrome, King SL all round, Cadence Amp, Kenwood 12" Sub, JL Audio 5x7's, Scuff Plates, MP3 Connector

For Go: SVI LPG, K&N Filter, F6 CAI, XR6T snorkle, XR8 catback, Magnaflow metal cat, Pacemaker headers, Underdrive, Thermostat, Custom tune, DBA4000

Now with baby seat and toys


175.6 rwkw

www.bseries.com.au/King_Nothing
King Nothing is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 01:45 PM   #13
LeadFoot81
_Oo===oO_
 
LeadFoot81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by King Nothing
(My repost from the FG/Orion Hub forum)

Great. Last time we had american input on the style we wound up with this. The biggest disaster for FoA of all time.



Sorry to all you AU fans, nothing personal, but it didn't sell.

Now the yanks have input on our engine, we lose out torquey I6.

Now we are going to let them give us a RWD platform? Where their current "hero" RWD is based on a live axle rear end? Sure it will be upgraded, but how long will it languish for in the newer design? If I hang on to my current car for a while, then it looks like my next car will most likely be a holden! It'll be more aussie than the "huntsman" at this rate.
And again...FFS they are not having input into the styling, the story was all about the engineering of Fords new global RWD platform. Get over the AUs styling! It was two generations ago! I read an interview with Mullaly where (he was admittedly sketchy on what was happening with the platform at that time) he said Ford Oz would have complete control over the next Falcons interior and exterior styling.
LeadFoot81 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 02:35 PM   #14
King Nothing
He has, the Knack..
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Fantastic_Ford
And again...FFS they are not having input into the styling, the story was all about the engineering of Fords new global RWD platform. Get over the AUs styling! It was two generations ago! I read an interview with Mullaly where (he was admittedly sketchy on what was happening with the platform at that time) he said Ford Oz would have complete control over the next Falcons interior and exterior styling.
My point wasn't about the styling, my point was the effect of American interference.
__________________
2010 BF MKIII Falcon wagon "EGO"

Workhorse, stock as a rock

2004 BA MKI Futura - Now the wife's

For Show: 18" Kaotic Shadow Chrome, King SL all round, Cadence Amp, Kenwood 12" Sub, JL Audio 5x7's, Scuff Plates, MP3 Connector

For Go: SVI LPG, K&N Filter, F6 CAI, XR6T snorkle, XR8 catback, Magnaflow metal cat, Pacemaker headers, Underdrive, Thermostat, Custom tune, DBA4000

Now with baby seat and toys


175.6 rwkw

www.bseries.com.au/King_Nothing
King Nothing is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 02:43 PM   #15
LeadFoot81
_Oo===oO_
 
LeadFoot81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by King Nothing
My point wasn't about the styling, my point was the effect of American interference.
This time, American influence means we get to keep the Falcon well in to the future, and all the perks of sharing a platform across the world.
LeadFoot81 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 08:21 PM   #16
DanielXR8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Fantastic_Ford
And again...FFS they are not having input into the styling, the story was all about the engineering of Fords new global RWD platform. Get over the AUs styling! It was two generations ago! I read an interview with Mullaly where (he was admittedly sketchy on what was happening with the platform at that time) he said Ford Oz would have complete control over the next Falcons interior and exterior styling.
To be fair, if the FG Falcon doesn't perform brilliantly in the sales charts, you can bet that parts of US Ford will be argueing that we should get whatever they make, slightly warmed over. Don't forget this is the crowd who gave us the Tarius, which was inferior in every way to the Falcon of the time. Didn't stop them foisting it on Ford Australia.

Also they are just plain arrogant and ignorant in equal measure. So your company is in the deep end, money is poring out everywhere, 41% of your domestic market wont consider you (US) and you need a great, no brilliant RWD car to replace the dinosaurs you have made for nearly three decades.

You look around and in Australia you have the single best RWD platform and engineers in the Ford company. No one else in the company can touch them. Absolutely no one knows how to do it better or for as little money. So you ignore them and give primary responsibility to the good ol boys. The ones that gave the US the American Focus, because a warmed over decade old car with awkward styling cues was always a better choice then the best the engineers in Europe could put on a boat or be built in the US with some strategic thinking.

Lesson learned by Ford US? No. Mistake about to happen. Yeap.

With Falcon sales never likely to recover they now have their chance to finally kill it off. Yes I think the American Falcon is coming and probably after this generation of Falcon.

The Falcon with some cash and a real will to make it all it could be, is capable of being as good as any platform on the market. Now we will never know.

Bloody shame.
Dan
DanielXR8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 08:37 PM   #17
LeadFoot81
_Oo===oO_
 
LeadFoot81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielXR8
To be fair, if the FG Falcon doesn't perform brilliantly in the sales charts, you can bet that parts of US Ford will be argueing that we should get whatever they make, slightly warmed over. Don't forget this is the crowd who gave us the Tarius, which was inferior in every way to the Falcon of the time. Didn't stop them foisting it on Ford Australia.

Also they are just plain arrogant and ignorant in equal measure. So your company is in the deep end, money is poring out everywhere, 41% of your domestic market wont consider you (US) and you need a great, no brilliant RWD car to replace the dinosaurs you have made for nearly three decades.

You look around and in Australia you have the single best RWD platform and engineers in the Ford company. No one else in the company can touch them. Absolutely no one knows how to do it better or for as little money. So you ignore them and give primary responsibility to the good ol boys. The ones that gave the US the American Focus, because a warmed over decade old car with awkward styling cues was always a better choice then the best the engineers in Europe could put on a boat or be built in the US with some strategic thinking.

Lesson learned by Ford US? No. Mistake about to happen. Yeap.

With Falcon sales never likely to recover they now have their chance to finally kill it off. Yes I think the American Falcon is coming and probably after this generation of Falcon.

The Falcon with some cash and a real will to make it all it could be, is capable of being as good as any platform on the market. Now we will never know.

Bloody shame.
Dan
You're right mate, Ford US want to ruin Ford Australia. I cant believe youve seen it all along and I missed it! case closed!
LeadFoot81 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 04:08 PM   #18
AU2PWR
Spin 'em Habib !
 
AU2PWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cranbourne Victoria
Posts: 3,854
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by King Nothing
(My repost from the FG/Orion Hub forum)

Great. Last time we had american input on the style we wound up with this. The biggest disaster for FoA of all time.



Sorry to all you AU fans, nothing personal, but it didn't sell.
Tool !
__________________
AU2PWR

AU2PWR is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-03-2008, 05:58 PM   #19
DJM83
Barra Turbo > V8
Donating Member3
 
DJM83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AU2PWR
Tool !
Ditto, re my sig. Takes a real ford fan to put their money where their mouth is and buy an AU. I hated them till i had one now ive had 2 and am close to the pinnicle of the AU, LONG LIVE THE MIGHTY AU
__________________
-2011 XR6 Turbo Ute - Lux Pack - M6
-2022 Hyundai Tucson Highlander Diesel N Line
DJM83 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-03-2008, 06:43 PM   #20
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default

The Australian Designed AU can't be too bad, after all the Merc CLS has a AU Boot and Lights...



...Au was ahead of its time.







Gotta love those T3's toughest looking car from that era...
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 02:28 PM   #21
RPO83
ĕm-bär'gō? 2016
 
RPO83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 680
Default

I'm now waiting for a post about how the Taurus was introduced to kill the Falcon...

The last time this all came up last year I flagged that FoA would not be the development hub for the next platform. I wouldn't stress though, the platform will no doubt be quite adaptable to suit our market.
RPO83 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 03:32 PM   #22
tbearz
Regular Member
 
tbearz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 127
Default

stupid americans grrrr they me off.....Ford NA make NO GOOD CARS, flex, focus are all fridges with wheels :S They all suck, no wonder they keep losing sales, yes everyone else is aswell but they are losing a larger percentage!!!

Ford Europe keeps kicking *** making cars people actually want!!! and Ford Aus does as well as it can with what it is given but the stupid ignorant americans just go hey my *** is getting fatter lets build a new crown vic that can fit another burger munching drive through moron in it with 10000 cup holders so can they can sip 100L of "Soda" on a road trip from thier house to the mall..GRRR

Why can't Ford wake up and smell the cheese its not that hard, if holden can build the world class zeta platform, why can ford australia be allowed to do it, they are the experts in rwd!!! Gees this sh!ts me to tears more aussie jobs going i guess..... sure we will still have the falcon but its going to be more US than AUS :(
tbearz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 03:49 PM   #23
irlewy86
Meep Meep
 
irlewy86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southside
Posts: 1,513
Default

The road to hell is paved with accountants.


Apparently Ford is well on its way.
__________________
Thundering on....
irlewy86 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 04:01 PM   #24
imugli
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 531
Default

I simply don't understand how they think they can do a better job, more economically than FoA. From a business perspective, it makes no sense...

Why not structure things so that each major market focuses on their strengths?Europe - FWD, AUS - RWD, USA - I'll let you know when I think of one...
imugli is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 04:12 PM   #25
irlewy86
Meep Meep
 
irlewy86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southside
Posts: 1,513
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by imugli
I simply don't understand how they think they can do a better job, more economically than FoA. From a business perspective, it makes no sense...

Why not structure things so that each major market focuses on their strengths?Europe - FWD, AUS - RWD, USA - I'll let you know when I think of one...
Easy,

EUROPE - FWD
AUS - RWD
USA - Pick - Ups, SUV's, Global Hybrid drives.
__________________
Thundering on....
irlewy86 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 04:22 PM   #26
LeadFoot81
_Oo===oO_
 
LeadFoot81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irlewy86
Easy,

EUROPE - FWD
AUS - RWD
USA - Pick - Ups, SUV's, Global Hybrid drives.
In a perfect world that would work a treat!
LeadFoot81 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 04:45 PM   #27
Fairlane
V8 Powaah
 
Fairlane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
Posts: 1,994
Default

Its not the first time Ford USA, has mucked its foreign divisions around.

The old DEW98 Platform was initially designed by Jaguar, then absolutely butchered by Ford US. It was a big blunder and was ultimately only used on Jag S-type, Lincoln LS & Thunderbird and in modified form under XF.

Cant trust the yanks to make a decent RWD platform, the only decent RWD cars in the US are either Panther platform from the 1970s or Chrysler LX which is old Merc E-class.

This is nasty news.
__________________
FG G6E Turbo- Seduce & Cashmere - Sold


XF S pack Sedan- AU 302 Windsor, T5, 2.77 LSD, Many Mods
Fairlane is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 04:47 PM   #28
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default

alot of people seem to be american bashing and not fully understanding the situation.

-The global RWD platform will use Au imput, Ford US know that we have got it sorted, they are using our knowlage of RWD dynamics to improve thier cars

-Falcon built on a global platform insures the future of the falcon.

-The fact that cars such as the GT500 will share simmiler platforms can only be a good sign for FPV...

-...And then there is Americas huge aftermarket support, even better for us Falcon fans.

-People seem to think that Aus will get a import Falcon, the way i see it Ford Aus will still build cars, including giving them a Aussi face lift

-The Final Au design was Australian, (Ok, it had american imput, but so does every falcon buil)

-Ford US didn't just kill the I6 for the sake of it, refer to piont 2, Its more economical for Ford globaly, and helped save the falcon

Alot of negative post here seem to lack some thought. Ford US know that they havn't got a good grip with RWD cars, so they came to australia for answers.
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 05:02 PM   #29
King Nothing
He has, the Knack..
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked
Ford US know that they havn't got a good grip with RWD cars, so they came to australia for answers.
I smell bulls**t. If we really are the "world experts in RWD" in Ford, then why are we just getting "input" to the project? Why give the job to someone who is less competent, with less experience, and only use the experts for "input"?

I don't totally buy the financial sense arguement. The amount of time/research they would need to spend simply to catch up to us wouldn't be insignificant. Another case of "America knows best".

I'm a young engineer, and even I know that "input" to a project is a far, far way from running it and being able to make any real decisions.
__________________
2010 BF MKIII Falcon wagon "EGO"

Workhorse, stock as a rock

2004 BA MKI Futura - Now the wife's

For Show: 18" Kaotic Shadow Chrome, King SL all round, Cadence Amp, Kenwood 12" Sub, JL Audio 5x7's, Scuff Plates, MP3 Connector

For Go: SVI LPG, K&N Filter, F6 CAI, XR6T snorkle, XR8 catback, Magnaflow metal cat, Pacemaker headers, Underdrive, Thermostat, Custom tune, DBA4000

Now with baby seat and toys


175.6 rwkw

www.bseries.com.au/King_Nothing
King Nothing is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-03-2008, 05:28 PM   #30
LeadFoot81
_Oo===oO_
 
LeadFoot81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by King Nothing
I smell bulls**t. If we really are the "world experts in RWD" in Ford, then why are we just getting "input" to the project? Why give the job to someone who is less competent, with less experience, and only use the experts for "input"?

I don't totally buy the financial sense arguement. The amount of time/research they would need to spend simply to catch up to us wouldn't be insignificant. Another case of "America knows best".

I'm a young engineer, and even I know that "input" to a project is a far, far way from running it and being able to make any real decisions.
Falcon is but one of many (American) cars that will be built off this platform, so yes its the yanks' call there. You don't think that Aussie engineers (and their data) can get the yanks up to speed? and for a minimal amount of dollars?
LeadFoot81 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL