|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
22-01-2013, 04:45 PM | #1 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,223
|
Just goes to show what a misconception that is.....
Quote:
Last edited by Auslandau; 22-01-2013 at 05:47 PM. Reason: MORE INFO WHEN PUTTING LINKS UP!!!! |
|||
22-01-2013, 04:56 PM | #2 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ACT
Posts: 11,647
|
Quote:
__________________
FG2 XR6T KIA Cerato 2022 Kawasaki Z900
|
|||
22-01-2013, 05:16 PM | #3 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 22,927
|
Yeah but whats an XR6 around town? 14.6....
Its all relative. 500 kms urban in an XR6 at 14.6 l/h = 73 litres. 73 litres at 1.45 = $106 500 kms urban in a Kia at 10.4 l/h = 52 litres at 1.45 = $75 so for every 500 kms you save $31... or every 1000 $62... Say you do 10,000 kms a year that's $620 The whole idea of buying a small car shouldn't be attributed by fuel savings alone... There's other factors like less depreciation (dollar value not necessarily %), cheaper rego, cheaper tyres (as most smaller cars still run smaller tyres), cheaper insurance etc etc. |
||
4 users like this post: |
22-01-2013, 05:29 PM | #4 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
|
Quote:
|
|||
9 users like this post: |
22-01-2013, 05:43 PM | #5 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,125
|
Quote:
|
|||
22-01-2013, 06:51 PM | #6 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
|
|
||
22-01-2013, 05:44 PM | #7 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,223
|
Quote:
I'm sorry but I have never understood that logic - and never will. Last edited by stevz; 22-01-2013 at 05:52 PM. |
|||
22-01-2013, 06:00 PM | #8 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 22,927
|
Quote:
|
|||
22-01-2013, 06:17 PM | #9 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 2,252
|
Quote:
"In any event, the argument that the low weight of cars with high fuel economy has resulted in many excess deaths is unfounded; that by paying careful attention to safety in vehicle design, smaller cars can be, and indeed have been, made as safe as larger ones" In fact their statistics go on to suggest that you are more likely to die 'statistically' in a performance model than you are in a 'buzbox' following with "Import luxury cars have the lowest combined risk, while sports cars have the highest combined risk" I put it too you that an XR6/8 is statistically more likely to kill than a corolla. and you wont have enough money to pay for a funeral due to the higher annual fuel bill. JP |
|||
This user likes this post: |
22-01-2013, 06:37 PM | #10 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,223
|
Quote:
If you were driving down the highway obeying the speed limit and minding your own business and a car coming the other way suddenly veered into your path and collided with you head on, do you seriously think you would be better of in a Getz than a BA? You don't have to be a crash safety engineer to see that the difference between a BA Falcon and a Getz is coming out with non life threatening injuries, and being carried away in a bag. I'm not denying that safety of small cars has improved significantly in recent years, but the Getz is a number of generations old and does not fall into this category. |
|||
This user likes this post: |
22-01-2013, 06:40 PM | #11 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 706
|
sometime its not just yhe fuel usage,what is the change over value in purchasing a new small car when they give bugger all tradein ,this extra money especialy if it is financed has to be taken into account as well,a bigger car that u own that uses a little fuel could well end up cheaper than a new car with payments,dosnt matter which pocket the money comes out of its still gone,and besides who wants there knees stuck under their chin and and having to send an invitation out to the speedo to move specialy when u turn the air con on in a 4 cyl
|
||
This user likes this post: |
22-01-2013, 05:51 PM | #12 | ||
335 - STILL THE BOSS ...
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melb East
Posts: 11,421
|
SO my GT335 driven 90% around town (not freeways) is sitting at 14.7/100 ..... so either it is bloody brilliant or a drive like a girl!
__________________
'73 Landau - 10.82 @ 131mph '11 FG GT335 - 12.43 @ 116mph '95 XG ute - 3 minutes, 21.14 @ 64mph 101,436 MEMBERS ......... 101,436 OPINIONS ..... What could possibly go wrong! Clevo Mafia [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
||
22-01-2013, 05:58 PM | #13 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 22,927
|
Quote:
My comparison was for comparison sake only, not gospel, based on ADR figures. And yes you probably do drive like an old woman or have one of those Brock Polarisers fitted, don't you just... Last edited by Smoke Pursuit; 22-01-2013 at 06:10 PM. |
|||
22-01-2013, 07:41 PM | #14 | |||
Moderator Ford Coupe Club
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vic
Posts: 3,905
|
Quote:
My current daily driver egg beater is noticeably cheaper to run than the BA despite having to run premium fuel.
__________________
Mitsubishi ASX Auto, White - Daily Commuter XC Fairmont Coupe, 351 4spd, Graphite Grey - The Antidote http://www.fordcoupeclub.org "If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there" George Harrison 2001. |
|||
22-01-2013, 07:46 PM | #15 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,125
|
Quote:
Insurance is cheap in a Falcon wagon, tyres are cheap 16", one of the cheapest cars on earth to service, I really can't complain. |
|||
22-01-2013, 07:56 PM | #16 | |||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,699
|
Quote:
|
|||
22-01-2013, 05:29 PM | #17 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Just waiting for a mate
Posts: 1,406
|
"Stagg why do you own a V8?! they cost the earth to run and make more pollution than my Corolla"
"I know they do, hence I drive it once every few weeks and ride a 250cc motorbike every day. Why do you drive a Corolla every day when it produces more pollution than my motorbike, and even though my car is a V8 there is still more pollution coming form your car, on a count of driving it every day?" This argument I face every day... first world problems lol
__________________
DAS IT MANE
|
||
2 users like this post: |
22-01-2013, 06:03 PM | #18 | ||
Donating Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,142
|
*sigh* this is why I love driving my cars to solely enjoy them. Not to worry about many microfarts extra fuel I burn when I think about stamping the loud pedal 1/10th of a second faster...
|
||
22-01-2013, 06:05 PM | #19 | ||
AFF Whore
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: In between gas stations
Posts: 2,246
|
Depending on who is driving my car its as fuel effecient as a kia or inefficient as an fa18... and usually sounds like one on full boost!
If youre worried about money dont buy a fuel guzzler... for the rest of us who dont even look at the pump price, thats our decision on how we spend our money... kindly take your co2 and cram it. |
||
22-01-2013, 06:12 PM | #20 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PERTH. WA
Posts: 4,697
|
If its a 4cyl it has to be manual or the economy will be not awesome,our old manual 2010 lancer got around high 6 to low 7 per hundred all city driving and was manual,autos were higher fuel consumption than that and slower too,it used to get driven pretty hard when i was behind the wheel,only issue was the front tyres wore out way too quick...
|
||
2 users like this post: |
22-01-2013, 06:36 PM | #21 | ||
AFF Whore
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: In between gas stations
Posts: 2,246
|
Jc, I remember reading somewhere that smart cars survive high speed impacts very well... but the geforces the occupants experience dont. They stated a larger car didnt fair any better, wish I could find the link!
|
||
22-01-2013, 07:13 PM | #22 | ||
meh.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Was Central Coast, Now Sydney NSW
Posts: 8,584
|
I'll keep my modified falcon and drive it every day... I'm getting ~8.5L/100km's in my wagon, and it doesn't get driven soft either.
Sometimes "medium sized" or "large" cars can get just as good, if not better fuel economy then a 4 or 3 banger...
__________________
Previous - BF XR6T - 325rwkw, 6 Speed Auto, Process West, X-Force and Turbosmart gear |
||
22-01-2013, 07:23 PM | #23 | ||
Where to next??
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 8,893
|
I can slightly better, match or add 30% to the factory consumption figures of any car I have owned. Depends on how they are driven.
__________________
___________________________ I've been around the world a couple of times or maybe more....... |
||
22-01-2013, 07:40 PM | #24 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 9,040
|
Kia have gotten into big trouble in the US from fudging economy figures....
Quote:
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170 2004 BA wagon RTV project. 1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red 1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired 1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project. |
|||
22-01-2013, 08:09 PM | #25 | ||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,699
|
I can't wait when my Falcon is on the road so I can drive it to and from work for a week to test out its fuel economy as I mainly do all highway.
Focus says my average speed is around 60km/h over a tank, when I drove it home I had the Falcon showing around 8L/100km on its fuel readout, but now its worked, so thats probably gone out the window. |
||
This user likes this post: |
23-01-2013, 02:45 PM | #26 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,922
|
There is a fuel saving driving a small car obviously.
But at what cost? Safety!! Would you want your wife and child in a Hyundai Getz whilst some clown collects them. More likely they will be alive to tell the tale in a falcon/Commodore or other big car. Thats my reason, forget the few $$ fuel savings. Im buying a safer environment for my family. |
|||
23-01-2013, 02:49 PM | #27 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
Who said that a small car is unsafe? Using this logic, we should all be driving Volvo’s, while wearing cotton wool suits. |
|||
This user likes this post: |
23-01-2013, 02:54 PM | #28 | |||
Where to next??
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 8,893
|
Quote:
__________________
___________________________ I've been around the world a couple of times or maybe more....... |
|||
4 users like this post: |
23-01-2013, 03:37 PM | #29 | |||
Powered by Marshall
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,143
|
Quote:
I'll take my MY2012 Yaris over your MY2000 anything thanks very much. However as stated in my post, 99% of the driving is single occupant driving. Me. So I'm perfectly happy thanks.Enough airbags to keep my boof head off the pavement easily. Our family commute is a 2010 Turbo Deisel Prado, which is where you will find my wife and child 99% of the time. However I would have no hesitation in putting them into a 2012 Toyota 4 door sedan either. I think this is where small cars are filling the niche. The commuter car as opposed to the aspirational / family car.
__________________
Powered by Marshall |
|||
23-01-2013, 04:53 PM | #30 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
|
Quote:
|
|||
This user likes this post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|